|
Politics Discussion | by mekkanik_mike | 2014-03-27 00:30:01 |
|
About Hobby Lobby. | by ShadowSystems | 2014-03-27 00:47:59 |
|
Everybody seems to be missing the real story here. | by RetiQlum2 | 2014-03-27 12:14:50 |
| The question is: Just because you pay for it, |
by Peace_Man |
2014-03-27 13:03:00 |
do you have control over it?
In the case of mandatory employer health care coverage, my opinion is 'no'. But that, as just about every other post on this subject I have seen here, is an opinion - YMMV.
Would it help the discussion if we could assume that an employer (Hobby Lobby, f. ex.) is responsible for providing health care coverage of a certain value to its employees, and leave the issue of exact coverage up to them? Or, in other words, why should it be allowed for an employer to impose its moral or religious values on its employees in any way? |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
That would make a lot more sense... | by RetiQlum2 | 2014-03-27 13:18:40 |
|
What we really need is a sword. | by RetiQlum2 | 2014-03-27 13:26:18 |
|
The sword of Nationalization? | by Peace_Man | 2014-03-27 13:45:47 |
|
Or, and this is just an idea... | by RetiQlum2 | 2014-03-27 14:05:51 |
|
That may not be the best idea, or in the best | by Peace_Man | 2014-03-27 21:05:10 |
|
Huh. You mean what we had BEFORE? When | by wwill | 2014-03-28 01:28:50 |
|
First, I disagree with your opinion... | by Ol_Gunner | 2014-03-27 13:55:26 |
|
Actually, SCOTUS did announce | by Peace_Man | 2014-03-27 21:13:57 |
|
You're neglecting to define 'gov't approved' | by wwill | 2014-03-28 01:38:25 |
