The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
Politics Discussion by mekkanik_mike2013-02-21 00:30:01
  NRA lays out facts about gun control to Senators. by SaylorA2013-02-21 07:43:09
    Mandatory background checks != Federal background by vdp2013-02-21 08:15:56
      While placing more hoops out for the law-abiding by LongFist2013-02-21 08:27:54
        So because criminals ignore speed limits, we by confused.brit2013-02-21 08:47:57
          Uh, no. It does mean we shouldn't just ADD more by Snate2013-02-21 08:54:41
            OK, well from where sit nice and safe across the by confused.brit2013-02-21 09:04:19
              CB the government IS trying to take guns by joecrouse 2013-02-21 09:43:42
And they are not making sense about it

VERY VERY VERY few crimes are committed with so called assault weapons (the term being meaningless is a side argument) 35 murders out of 8700 gun related murders a year and last year was a very BAD year. Its usually 3 or 4 mostly in hunting accidents (because people do use Semi Automatic Rifles to hunt not everyone likes bolt actions) Less than 350 were committed with actual Rifles, and of the handguns used in crimes less than 5 percent were by Lawfully owned and registered handguns.

So why are they targeting law abiding Rifle and handgun owners when we contribute less than 10 percent of the problem.



[ Reply ]
                As a matter of fact, there are more knife murders by SaylorA2013-02-21 10:08:31
                Are they? by rkfig2013-02-21 10:25:26
                  One proposal is to have a mandatory buy-back by SaylorA2013-02-21 10:28:59
                    Source please? by DesiredUsername2013-02-21 10:39:10
                      News paper article good enough? by joecrouse2013-02-21 10:41:55
                        and another by joecrouse2013-02-21 10:43:25
                          Yup, thanks! (n/t) by DesiredUsername2013-02-21 10:49:44
                          That second link sounds a bit whacky. by retiqlum22013-02-21 18:51:33
                            Maybe by DesiredUsername2013-02-21 20:51:28
                    I saw that by rkfig2013-02-21 10:44:51
                      You think if she got something a lot milder by joecrouse2013-02-21 11:01:02
                        There is a logical fallacy lurking there, you know (n/t) by vdp2013-02-21 14:03:47
                          I'll play dumb by DesiredUsername2013-02-21 15:20:57
                          how so. by joecrouse2013-02-21 15:42:32
                            A link by vdp2013-02-21 19:26:18
                  Bans on magazine sales, by joecrouse2013-02-21 10:37:47
                    I understand that argument. by rkfig2013-02-21 11:01:20
                      The penalties for non compliance by joecrouse2013-02-21 11:06:24
                      Did you carefully read the part in the letter by SaylorA2013-02-21 11:39:08

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)