UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Thoughts on the "Open Comment" rule.	by aix tom	2011-09-03 10:18:09
I am not sure I follow	by vdp	2011-09-03 11:51:28
It's just basically that these days ..	by aix tom	2011-09-03 12:30:05
Good point, there.	by Peace_Man	2011-09-03 13:53:38
Now, originally the ID9K was to avoid direct links to NFYOS stuff - because advertisers might withdraw their sponsorship because of it. In which case it really didn't matter much if links that didn't need it got the treatment. I think the sponsorship has changed though. Which means that the use of ID9K should as well. And your point of making it useless as a warning of content by overusing it is very apropos. Personally I have avoided using it when I felt it wasn't necessary. For example, CBC has fairly strict moderation, so unless a subject were very contentious and likely to draw out borderline comments (that would be OK by CBC standards but not by FYOSS) I have avoided ID9K for CBC links. So possibly starting to call ID9K's that aren't needed -- the "just in case" ones -- would be appropriate now. What do other people think?
[ Reply ]
I think JD, the Admins and Mods are discussing it.	by wwill	2011-09-03 14:09:37

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)