UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Thoughts on the "Open Comment" rule.	by aix tom	2011-09-03 10:18:09
I am not sure I follow	by vdp	2011-09-03 11:51:28
What do you mean by "For example, links to YouTube which is a link to a site OFF the main advertiser are verboten"? In general, what you describe about www.orafaq.com and free range kids I don't consider as "open comments", and I also think direct links to these sites would not be modded. I don't recall ever seeing a link to a site which is not already known as truly "open comment" to have been modded without the presence of "bad" open comments. IOW, I think what you are asking for has already been the MO of the mods, and I fully support your request that people don't call the mods on direct links, unless there is evidence of bad comments. I have actually commented on some ID9K-ed links that there was no reason to do it, since the comments in question were not "open comments".
[ Reply ]
It's just basically that these days ..	by aix tom	2011-09-03 12:30:05
Good point, there.	by Peace_Man	2011-09-03 13:53:38
I think JD, the Admins and Mods are discussing it.	by wwill	2011-09-03 14:09:37

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)