|
The topic was "How to keep your faith in college" | by toysbfun | 2010-09-28 07:52:49 |
| See, this irritates me. |
by the_diggity |
2010-09-28 08:21:55 |
| Science and religion are not mutually exclusive. In fact, they're complementary - religion tells you why, science tells you how. I don't see why believing in one should have an adverse effect on believing the other. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
^ THIS! (n/t) | by Llyr | 2010-09-28 08:29:48 |
|
Faith in $deity =/= faith in $church | by chanceslost | 2010-09-28 08:32:11 |
|
Correct | by the_diggity | 2010-09-28 08:44:54 |
|
Or that being a hard science researcher means | by Twitchh | 2010-09-28 10:19:12 |
|
I don't believe in atheism. (n/t) | by daemon_poet | 2010-09-28 10:53:56 |
|
Science and spiritual beliefs are not mutually | by vdp | 2010-09-28 08:32:20 |
|
Often? | by MatthewDBA | 2010-09-28 09:08:08 |
|
Religion requires unquestionable belief | by vdp | 2010-09-28 09:19:14 |
|
No it doesn't, at least if I'm understanding you | by MatthewDBA | 2010-09-28 09:22:33 |
|
Mostly, yes, but not always | by Concept | 2010-09-28 08:33:23 |
|
Evolution doesn't jive too well with | by toysbfun | 2010-09-28 08:46:02 |
|
I don't see why not. | by vampire | 2010-09-28 09:00:56 |
|
Can't link easily from the Captivate but | by toysbfun | 2010-09-28 09:50:55 |
|
I've read it. | by MatthewDBA | 2010-09-28 09:59:35 |
|
Why would a just and omnibenevolent God | by toysbfun | 2010-09-28 10:03:38 |
|
On what basis are we to infer | by MatthewDBA | 2010-09-28 10:05:42 |
|
I'll write up a proof when I'm back at my PC. (n/t | by toysbfun | 2010-09-28 11:05:42 |
|
Also depends on the degree of detail. | by aix tom | 2010-09-28 08:54:10 |
|
Which of the hard sciences did you major in? (n/t) | by toysbfun | 2010-09-28 08:33:52 |
|
Chemistry, but changed my major | by the_diggity | 2010-09-28 08:37:25 |
|
And your reaction when you realized that | by toysbfun | 2010-09-28 08:50:40 |
|
Can't say, since I never realized that :p (n/t) | by the_diggity | 2010-09-28 08:51:41 |
|
I'll elaborate later, I'm at work | by the_diggity | 2010-09-28 09:13:09 |
|
IMO science is aimed at replacing belief | by vectorz | 2010-09-28 09:10:03 |
|
There are scientific observations | by MatthewDBA | 2010-09-28 09:16:19 |
|
Thats the wrong way round. | by vectorz | 2010-09-28 09:30:05 |
|
And the internal consistency is somewhat lacking (n/t) | by PeKaJe | 2010-09-28 09:35:42 |
|
Again, that's virtually unavoidable | by MatthewDBA | 2010-09-28 09:40:19 |
|
That's unavoidable when dealing with history | by MatthewDBA | 2010-09-28 09:38:51 |
|
They often don't. But thats opely communicated. | by vectorz | 2010-09-28 10:19:26 |
|
Whether they're plausible or not | by MatthewDBA | 2010-09-28 10:21:54 |
|
Ok bad wording: | by vectorz | 2010-09-28 16:08:24 |
|
history tells you when, philosophy tells you what? (n/t) | by joresgump | 2010-09-28 09:15:49 |
|
philosophy of history tells you? | by MatthewDBA | 2010-09-28 09:26:08 |
|
The truth is written by the winner side. | by joresgump | 2010-09-28 11:59:49 |
