|
A question for conservatives and/or libertarians. | by Sharku | 2009-12-02 07:52:23 |
|
Well, just look around. | by JaR | 2009-12-02 08:25:00 |
|
That is incorrect | by DesertRat66 | 2009-12-02 08:51:23 |
|
Even further back. | by toysbfun | 2009-12-02 10:01:35 |
|
I'm not seeing | by MatthewDBA | 2009-12-02 10:05:45 |
| Medical schools limit the number of students, |
by toysbfun |
2009-12-02 10:18:06 |
| ensuring the supply of doctors is lower the demand of the market, which means the doctors will be able to earn more. Furthermore, to practice medicine, one needs to go to medical school, and medical schools are accredited by the LCME, which is sponsered by the AMA. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Generally, in a guild, | by MatthewDBA | 2009-12-02 10:27:29 |
|
Or not require med school to practice medicine. | by toysbfun | 2009-12-02 10:33:07 |
|
Wouldn't that put people at risk | by MatthewDBA | 2009-12-02 11:04:03 |
|
Caveat emptor. | by toysbfun | 2009-12-02 11:20:09 |
|
RateMyXYZ | by MatthewDBA | 2009-12-02 11:39:21 |
|
See also the huge amounts of faith... | by Sharku | 2009-12-02 11:43:04 |
|
We already have that. It's called homeopathy | by AndyA | 2009-12-02 11:53:05 |
|
Those actually do require schooling | by MatthewDBA | 2009-12-02 12:02:11 |
|
That depends on the country you are in. | by AndyA | 2009-12-02 12:09:49 |
|
I wouldn't discount *everything* they do | by MatthewDBA | 2009-12-02 12:14:36 |
|
I'm sure there are | by AndyA | 2009-12-02 12:35:18 |
|
I don't think that's necessarily the case. | by MatthewDBA | 2009-12-02 13:11:46 |
|
Contrary to popular beleif, most of the | by Classic_Jon | 2009-12-02 13:44:26 |
|
That is the US approach not "western medicine" | by AndyA | 2009-12-02 14:24:19 |
|
Most medical personel I speak to consider the US t | by Classic_Jon | 2009-12-02 15:12:58 |
|
The US is a subset of western medicine | by AndyA | 2009-12-02 15:44:10 |
