|
A question for conservatives and/or libertarians. | by Sharku | 2009-12-02 07:52:23 |
|
Well, just look around. | by JaR | 2009-12-02 08:25:00 |
| That is incorrect |
by DesertRat66 |
2009-12-02 08:51:23 |
| Health Care hasn't been a truly free and open market in the US since WWII |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Even further back. | by toysbfun | 2009-12-02 10:01:35 |
|
I'm not seeing | by MatthewDBA | 2009-12-02 10:05:45 |
|
Medical schools limit the number of students, | by toysbfun | 2009-12-02 10:18:06 |
|
Generally, in a guild, | by MatthewDBA | 2009-12-02 10:27:29 |
|
Or not require med school to practice medicine. | by toysbfun | 2009-12-02 10:33:07 |
|
Wouldn't that put people at risk | by MatthewDBA | 2009-12-02 11:04:03 |
|
Caveat emptor. | by toysbfun | 2009-12-02 11:20:09 |
|
RateMyXYZ | by MatthewDBA | 2009-12-02 11:39:21 |
|
See also the huge amounts of faith... | by Sharku | 2009-12-02 11:43:04 |
|
We already have that. It's called homeopathy | by AndyA | 2009-12-02 11:53:05 |
|
Those actually do require schooling | by MatthewDBA | 2009-12-02 12:02:11 |
|
That depends on the country you are in. | by AndyA | 2009-12-02 12:09:49 |
|
I wouldn't discount *everything* they do | by MatthewDBA | 2009-12-02 12:14:36 |
|
I'm sure there are | by AndyA | 2009-12-02 12:35:18 |
|
I don't think that's necessarily the case. | by MatthewDBA | 2009-12-02 13:11:46 |
|
Contrary to popular beleif, most of the | by Classic_Jon | 2009-12-02 13:44:26 |
|
That is the US approach not "western medicine" | by AndyA | 2009-12-02 14:24:19 |
|
Most medical personel I speak to consider the US t | by Classic_Jon | 2009-12-02 15:12:58 |
|
The US is a subset of western medicine | by AndyA | 2009-12-02 15:44:10 |
|
OIC! | by JaR | 2009-12-02 11:52:35 |
|
This is the argument... | by firehawk | 2009-12-02 12:44:26 |
|
Here's a question that never gets answered | by DesertRat66 | 2009-12-02 13:58:36 |
|
WWII? (n/t) | by JaR | 2009-12-02 14:29:43 |
|
Hardly (n/t) | by DesertRat66 | 2009-12-02 15:03:08 |
|
So you contend that | by JaR | 2009-12-02 15:26:37 |
|
I'd guess that he'll say it was done inefficiently | by AndyA | 2009-12-02 15:51:47 |
|
And he also ignores that... | by firehawk | 2009-12-02 15:58:02 |
|
And who are the Governments stockholders? (n/t) | by DesertRat66 | 2009-12-02 18:02:25 |
|
A question that is irrelevant to the subject. | by firehawk | 2009-12-02 19:02:52 |
|
McDonnell Douglas A4 Skyhawk (n/t) | by DesertRat66 | 2009-12-02 18:03:32 |
|
? (n/t) | by vetitice | 2009-12-02 18:18:59 |
|
I agree, please elucidate, DR66... | by firehawk | 2009-12-02 19:03:34 |
|
Came in under budget | by DesertRat66 | 2009-12-02 19:06:20 |
|
Any examples in the last 50 years? | by firehawk | 2009-12-02 19:43:45 |
|
Lots | by DesertRat66 | 2009-12-02 20:16:48 |
|
Lots with no documentation, eh? | by firehawk | 2009-12-02 20:48:57 |
|
Didn't say no documentation | by DesertRat66 | 2009-12-02 21:15:01 |
|
Yes, but... | by firehawk | 2009-12-02 21:28:11 |
|
Fermilab and the NASM both did that too. | by vetitice | 2009-12-02 19:55:50 |
|
World War II was an event | by DesertRat66 | 2009-12-02 18:01:43 |
|
How does it compare to other wars? | by firehawk | 2009-12-02 19:04:22 |
|
Still events | by DesertRat66 | 2009-12-02 19:18:27 |
|
The question is, can you. | by firehawk | 2009-12-02 19:44:30 |
|
Still can't keep up can you? | by DesertRat66 | 2009-12-02 20:15:38 |
|
I'm keeping up just fine. | by firehawk | 2009-12-02 20:52:20 |
|
Nope, you're not | by DesertRat66 | 2009-12-02 21:24:20 |
|
Inane? Contradictory? *chuckle* | by firehawk | 2009-12-02 21:29:15 |
|
Nice way to not address what I said. | by firehawk | 2009-12-02 15:57:07 |
|
You advocate Government as an effective solution | by DesertRat66 | 2009-12-02 18:05:59 |
|
That's not what I said, and not what I meant. | by firehawk | 2009-12-02 19:05:47 |
|
Never said that | by DesertRat66 | 2009-12-02 13:57:32 |
|
I suppose you'd advocate privatising | by JaR | 2009-12-02 14:27:20 |
|
No, No, Possibly, It's worth considering | by DesertRat66 | 2009-12-02 15:02:04 |
|
What part of | by JaR | 2009-12-02 15:20:38 |
|
The first issue | by DesertRat66 | 2009-12-02 17:51:27 |
|
Again, you're hijacking a post... | by firehawk | 2009-12-02 16:01:04 |
|
That may be what you read | by DesertRat66 | 2009-12-02 17:55:24 |
|
Interesting. | by firehawk | 2009-12-02 19:00:09 |