|
Lawdog on Separation of Church and State | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 07:37:13 |
|
At some point... | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 08:18:11 |
|
THE DOCTERINE OF RELATIVE FILTH | by SnArL | 2009-08-26 08:46:04 |
|
Nobody SHOULD be doing it. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 09:16:50 |
|
[CITATION NEEDED] | by SnArL | 2009-08-26 09:20:55 |
|
Oh, how short the memory. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 11:10:20 |
|
How does Snarl saying something equate to | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-26 11:12:44 |
|
Snarl didn't say what he thought was conjecture. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 11:24:58 |
|
Your "picked something", to me at least, | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-26 11:27:48 |
|
What am I supposed to be advancing? | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 11:45:30 |
|
My point is that if you want to debate and discuss | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-26 11:57:11 |
|
I don't want to debate and discuss. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 12:12:07 |
|
What good would that do? | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 12:13:14 |
|
One word... | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 12:20:57 |
|
And yet when somebody brings up the death penalty | by SnArL | 2009-08-26 12:22:48 |
|
Exactly. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 12:31:27 |
|
Who is "the right"? | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 12:35:11 |
|
Them. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 12:46:54 |
|
"Them" isn't very definitive. (n/t) | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 12:51:47 |
|
Of course not. | by SnArL | 2009-08-26 12:55:16 |
|
See, I knew you'd get it. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 13:10:31 |
|
So let me make sure I am understanding | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-26 13:37:53 |
|
More or less. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 14:01:56 |
|
Stated that way you are making much more sense | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-26 14:20:09 |
|
I'm tired of... | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 14:37:11 |
|
Honestly, if you had said it that way | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-26 14:45:30 |
|
And a lot of people wouldn't have gotten it. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 14:51:18 |
|
I *strongly* disagree. I think you hurt your | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-26 15:01:18 |
|
Actually, you're agreeing with me. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 15:09:26 |
| No, I think that if that was your end goal |
by Classic_Jon |
2009-08-26 15:18:16 |
you could have accomplished is in a much better way than by basically causing a blow up OR you could have STATED that you were doing it that way to prove your point in the folly.
At the point you were at, you were the one being "obtuse." If that was your goal, you succeeded in getting Snarl riled up and proved that you and he can fuss and feud ...but that does not move your point forward as much as the one post above did when you answered things clearly and concisely.
If your goal was to cause an argument/fight, then you have just lost a great deal of respect from me. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
It was not to cause a fight. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 15:33:10 |
|
I think there are probably | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 16:30:10 |
|
True, but with the object lesson | by Nightwind | 2009-08-26 19:21:45 |
|
I think most people already knew it. (n/t) | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 19:43:17 |
