UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Lawdog on Separation of Church and State	by DesertRat66	2009-08-26 07:37:13
Setting aside the religious aspect...	by Stuka	2009-08-26 12:28:25
I like that approach	by MatthewDBA	2009-08-26 12:32:11
Let me see if I have this right.	by aprylmae	2009-08-26 12:46:37
No, we don't.	by MatthewDBA	2009-08-26 12:50:38
Then why have a president at all?	by aprylmae	2009-08-26 13:01:22
Strictly speaking, we don't elect a President	by MatthewDBA	2009-08-26 13:07:57
But to whom is blame assigned	by aprylmae	2009-08-26 13:15:56
He shouldn't be.	by MatthewDBA	2009-08-26 13:19:19
I wouldn't blame him for not fulfilling a campaign promise. Blame should not be assigned to the President for that; it should be assigned to the legislature. But since the legislature is a body, it becomes more difficult to attach blame to a single person - it's easier to pin blame on one person; and that person happens to be the President. In other words - The President is blamed if his promised changes are not made; but it is actually the legislature that should be blamed. Therefore, the President shouldn't be making the promises in the first place.
[ Reply ]

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)