The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
Lawdog on Separation of Church and State by DesertRat662009-08-26 07:37:13
  Setting aside the religious aspect... by Stuka 2009-08-26 12:28:25
If we were to work under the assumption that our government is still organized into Legislative, Executive, and Judicial branches (hardly safe IMHO), then it seems to me that this is an attempt by the Executive branch to push its desired policy on the Legislative branch by appealing to the legislators' constituents directly. That bothers me more than the religious implications, which I find to be...tangential at best.
[ Reply ]
    I like that approach by MatthewDBA2009-08-26 12:32:11
      Let me see if I have this right. by aprylmae2009-08-26 12:46:37
        No, we don't. by MatthewDBA2009-08-26 12:50:38
          Then why have a president at all? by aprylmae2009-08-26 13:01:22
            Strictly speaking, we don't elect a President by MatthewDBA2009-08-26 13:07:57
              But to whom is blame assigned by aprylmae2009-08-26 13:15:56
                He shouldn't be. by MatthewDBA2009-08-26 13:19:19
    Appealing to the legislators' constituents by DesertRat662009-08-26 12:44:57
      can you think of a better way of by aprylmae2009-08-26 12:56:35
        I can think of more appropriate ones by DesertRat662009-08-26 13:03:26
          I disagree by aprylmae2009-08-26 13:08:08
            specifically sent someone to do so for him... by DesertRat662009-08-26 13:18:48
              not really by aprylmae2009-08-26 13:28:13
                really by DesertRat662009-08-26 13:40:22

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)