The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Lawdog on Separation of Church and State by DesertRat662009-08-26 07:37:13
  So what part of by buddha2009-08-26 08:31:44
    My problem is missing the last 6 words by robertltux2009-08-26 09:23:42
      Atheisism is not a religion. by buddha2009-08-26 09:35:43
        You typed #4 without reading it? by adiplomat2009-08-26 09:42:34
          Faith that something doesn't exist? by buddha2009-08-26 09:56:06
            Incorrect. THAT'S an agnostic. by adiplomat2009-08-26 10:02:42
              No, agnostic is by buddha2009-08-26 10:04:42
                You skipped the main point, I see. by adiplomat2009-08-26 10:12:40
                  There's a difference. by kelli217 2009-08-26 11:56:23
Colloquial but commonly accepted definitions of 'agnostic' notwithstanding.

Agnostics say: "I don't know, and it may not be possible to know, but that does not preclude faith, as it is the nature of faith to believe the unknowable."

Atheists come in two stripes: "I don't believe in God," and, "I believe there is no God." The former statement is labeled 'weak atheism' and the latter is labeled 'strong atheism.'

I'm not an agnostic. I'm an atheist. I do not have faith in the inherently unknowable, and I do not think that it is a good idea to turn over such an important part of my life to that kind of faith. I am not open to considering faith on that basis. I don't believe in God. But I don't try to say definitively that there is no God. I just ask for proof, and insist that such a profound claim be backed with the most rigorous evidence.
[ Reply ]

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)