|
Lawdog on Separation of Church and State | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 07:37:13 |
|
And this differs from the right-wing churches how? | by werehatrack | 2009-08-26 08:43:39 |
|
Oh... Just this: | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 08:50:37 |
| How many times did Bush Jr meet |
by werehatrack |
2009-08-26 08:57:24 |
behind closed doors with representatives and leaders of right-wing churches? Do you think, for one moment, that those channels directly into the Oval Office weren't being employed for precisely this purpose and worse? And how much critical or cautionary mention did Lawdog - or any other right-wing support group - ever make of these meetings?
It was OK then; it was them doing it... |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Data needed, without an example argument doesn't | by techi870 | 2009-08-26 09:02:08 |
|
Jeff Sharlet reported in a 2005 Harper's | by buddha | 2009-08-26 09:28:08 |
|
The unanswered question | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 09:35:55 |
|
Per my post below, | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 09:44:39 |
|
Well it wouldn't take a rocket scientist | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 10:06:56 |
|
If it's what I'm thinking of | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 10:13:34 |
|
Thanks, If UF has taught me nothing else, I've | by techi870 | 2009-08-26 09:38:56 |
|
Unless I misread it, all your article indicates is | by SaylorA | 2009-08-26 09:43:10 |
|
Just backing up the claim he met with right | by buddha | 2009-08-26 09:46:52 |
|
Fair enough. I had construed your post to imply | by SaylorA | 2009-08-26 09:49:36 |
|
None that I'm aware of. | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 09:02:55 |
|
Bush met with religious leaders most Mondays. | by werehatrack | 2009-08-26 09:42:41 |
|
While interesting, yet very tinfoil hatish | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 10:03:51 |
|
He didn't need to. | by JaR | 2009-08-26 10:36:22 |
|
I don't recall mention of any evidence for that. (n/t) | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 10:39:34 |
|
Let me see if I got this straight | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 10:53:33 |
|
I fail to see the difference. | by JaR | 2009-08-26 11:08:23 |
|
And why is it more palatable? | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 11:21:48 |
|
Nope. Altho your 1st statement is | by JaR | 2009-08-26 11:44:42 |
|
You should have known | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 11:59:36 |
|
Yup. In hindsight. My bad. (n/t) | by JaR | 2009-08-26 12:35:58 |
|
I had a head start | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 12:51:59 |
|
I have to question this | by Stuka | 2009-08-26 12:21:58 |
|
Hmmm | by JaR | 2009-08-26 12:48:33 |
|
The powers not delegated to the United States by | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 12:57:17 |
|
True enough. | by JaR | 2009-08-26 14:01:06 |
|
It's only because we allow it that it happens | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 14:20:50 |
|
Truth is, however, that we DO allow | by JaR | 2009-08-26 15:48:33 |
|
Actually some of those are constitutional. | by SaylorA | 2009-08-26 14:28:13 |
|
Just one question: | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 13:16:36 |
|
He's gone a long way in 2 | by Stuka | 2009-08-26 14:28:14 |
|
Thought it was 2 auto makers | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 14:30:39 |
|
Couldn't remember about Chrysler | by Stuka | 2009-08-26 21:03:02 |
|
The seperation was never intended to remove | by SaylorA | 2009-08-26 11:48:08 |
