| Lawdog on Separation of Church and State |
by DesertRat66 |
2009-08-26 07:37:13 |
I'd like to think that those Certain People who would have absolutely lost their minds in an Internet apoplectic fit had prior Presidents attempted to do this thing, would have the same reaction now that our current President has done it.
I'd like to think that, I really would -- but I won't be holding my breath.(link) |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
At some point... | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 08:18:11 |
|
Don't worry; you will | by bitflipper | 2009-08-26 08:23:29 |
|
Invoking a divine being is not the same as | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-26 08:26:45 |
|
Except that | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 08:33:31 |
|
Wish Granted: Beck Boycot Backed By White House? | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 08:39:27 |
|
THE DOCTERINE OF RELATIVE FILTH | by SnArL | 2009-08-26 08:46:04 |
|
Nobody SHOULD be doing it. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 09:16:50 |
|
"Dirty tricks" are no better | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 09:18:46 |
|
OK, lets get factual then, Please | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-26 09:19:12 |
|
[CITATION NEEDED] | by SnArL | 2009-08-26 09:20:55 |
|
Oh, how short the memory. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 11:10:20 |
|
How does Snarl saying something equate to | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-26 11:12:44 |
|
Snarl didn't say what he thought was conjecture. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 11:24:58 |
|
Your "picked something", to me at least, | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-26 11:27:48 |
|
What am I supposed to be advancing? | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 11:45:30 |
|
Just because one player is ignoring the rules | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 11:54:32 |
|
Maybe a man reference will clarify. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 12:05:42 |
|
No, I don't think I would reach that point. | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 12:11:59 |
|
My point is that if you want to debate and discuss | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-26 11:57:11 |
|
I don't want to debate and discuss. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 12:12:07 |
|
What good would that do? | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 12:13:14 |
|
One word... | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 12:20:57 |
|
And yet when somebody brings up the death penalty | by SnArL | 2009-08-26 12:22:48 |
|
Exactly. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 12:31:27 |
|
Who is "the right"? | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 12:35:11 |
|
Them. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 12:46:54 |
|
"Them" isn't very definitive. (n/t) | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 12:51:47 |
|
Of course not. | by SnArL | 2009-08-26 12:55:16 |
|
See, I knew you'd get it. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 13:10:31 |
|
You're correct in that. | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 13:14:56 |
|
Let me make sure I understand this, k? | by SnArL | 2009-08-26 13:42:27 |
|
I agree on the logic but, your snark volume lately | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-26 13:46:03 |
|
So I'm now responsible for how others react? | by SnArL | 2009-08-26 14:11:15 |
|
No, but you are responsible for how you react | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-26 14:29:29 |
|
And when the other side consistently fails to make | by SnArL | 2009-08-26 14:46:38 |
|
Just a small observation | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 14:54:29 |
|
Very wise man in that your Pappy (n/t) | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-26 15:02:16 |
|
I would like to draw your attention to something. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 14:54:36 |
|
Then call them on it and don't pretty much | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-26 14:59:36 |
|
So let me make sure I am understanding | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-26 13:37:53 |
|
More or less. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 14:01:56 |
|
Stated that way you are making much more sense | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-26 14:20:09 |
|
I'm tired of... | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 14:37:11 |
|
Honestly, if you had said it that way | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-26 14:45:30 |
|
And a lot of people wouldn't have gotten it. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 14:51:18 |
|
I *strongly* disagree. I think you hurt your | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-26 15:01:18 |
|
Actually, you're agreeing with me. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 15:09:26 |
|
No, I think that if that was your end goal | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-26 15:18:16 |
|
It was not to cause a fight. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 15:33:10 |
|
I think there are probably | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 16:30:10 |
|
True, but with the object lesson | by Nightwind | 2009-08-26 19:21:45 |
|
I think most people already knew it. (n/t) | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 19:43:17 |
|
Good. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 13:05:08 |
|
There have been, as I believe I remember, | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 13:13:21 |
|
Not improper at all. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 13:43:09 |
|
O, I C WUT U DID THAR | by SnArL | 2009-08-26 14:09:37 |
|
Single-Largest Ideological Group Is: | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 13:13:55 |
|
Self-identified, label-based. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 13:40:28 |
|
Whatever helps you sleep at night | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 13:48:31 |
|
Application denied | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 12:36:24 |
|
You're right, I have no reputation for being... | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 12:46:19 |
|
<Deleted> | <Deleted> | 2009-08-26 12:50:57 |
|
Modded, double post. (n/t) | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 12:51:09 |
|
I never quite got the idea of revenge. | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 12:23:02 |
|
It's like an unstable explosive | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 12:39:16 |
|
Is this something that you are looking for? | by SaylorA | 2009-08-26 12:29:35 |
|
Yep! Good! | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 12:40:30 |
|
Wow. I have to applaud your debate skills | by SnArL | 2009-08-26 12:11:20 |
|
I'm done being nice. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 12:24:03 |
|
Really, now | by SnArL | 2009-08-26 12:41:44 |
|
Yes, that's what the discussion is about. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 12:54:57 |
|
Apparently, a number of people still | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 12:57:30 |
|
Do they always care, or only when it suits them? (n/t) | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 13:07:24 |
|
I can only speak definitively for myself | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 13:15:54 |
|
Agreed, to me, if any and I do mean **any** | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-26 13:42:53 |
|
Personally | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 13:45:03 |
|
I am pretty close to that depending on the | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-26 14:34:49 |
|
And when requested to, you were unable or | by SnArL | 2009-08-26 13:13:44 |
|
Wow. I've been misbehaving today, but... | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 13:35:06 |
|
Snarl, as a friend, take a time out, please (n/t) | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-26 13:48:20 |
|
As Classic Jon said, take a break. | by Nea | 2009-08-26 14:02:22 |
|
hmmm perhaps we should have a fund raiser | by aprylmae | 2009-08-26 09:31:25 |
|
Meh, I'm still trying to turn of Snark Lock. (n/t) | by chanceslost | 2009-08-26 09:35:58 |
|
SORRY! I WENT TO A CONCERT LAST NIGHT | by SnArL | 2009-08-26 09:49:02 |
|
Forgot your ear plugs? | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 10:11:26 |
|
*boggle* I had not heard that and yes | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-26 08:21:36 |
|
So what part of | by buddha | 2009-08-26 08:31:44 |
|
I don't think there is a claim that | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 08:38:44 |
|
I was going by the title | by buddha | 2009-08-26 08:49:23 |
|
"Separation of Church and State" | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 08:54:02 |
|
A familiar question | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 08:41:38 |
|
I think nativity displays are fine | by buddha | 2009-08-26 09:01:27 |
|
That would be tough | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 09:07:06 |
|
my main concern on prayer in public school | by aprylmae | 2009-08-26 09:09:21 |
|
I'd prefer that faculty and staff not be involved | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 09:12:01 |
|
agreed | by aprylmae | 2009-08-26 09:13:47 |
|
My problem is missing the last 6 words | by robertltux | 2009-08-26 09:23:42 |
|
Atheisism is not a religion. | by buddha | 2009-08-26 09:35:43 |
|
All but 1a and 1b (n/t) | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 09:38:10 |
|
I'm looking at the Random House dictionary | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 09:41:11 |
|
Devotional and ritual? | by buddha | 2009-08-26 10:01:23 |
|
The first definition states | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 10:10:05 |
|
I don't believe in | by buddha | 2009-08-26 13:53:08 |
|
Strong atheism: beliefs held to with ardor [...] | by chanceslost | 2009-08-26 09:41:50 |
|
You typed #4 without reading it? | by adiplomat | 2009-08-26 09:42:34 |
|
Faith that something doesn't exist? | by buddha | 2009-08-26 09:56:06 |
|
Incorrect. THAT'S an agnostic. | by adiplomat | 2009-08-26 10:02:42 |
|
No, agnostic is | by buddha | 2009-08-26 10:04:42 |
|
You skipped the main point, I see. | by adiplomat | 2009-08-26 10:12:40 |
|
There's a difference. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 11:56:23 |
|
I must be religious because I | by buddha | 2009-08-26 13:51:17 |
|
That varies with the definition | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 10:04:51 |
|
religion and faith aren't about proof | by aprylmae | 2009-08-26 10:58:29 |
|
A comment from an atheist: | by Ascag | 2009-08-26 12:09:07 |
|
This is actually faith | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 12:16:53 |
|
Might be, yes. | by Ascag | 2009-08-26 12:40:00 |
|
I'm not sure what you mean | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 12:46:09 |
|
So I said "It's only a grain". | by Ascag | 2009-08-26 12:59:10 |
|
If you make up the rules yourself | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 13:03:32 |
|
A proposal: | by Ascag | 2009-08-26 13:19:02 |
|
It would be a good question. | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 13:25:14 |
|
It's getting late here. | by Ascag | 2009-08-26 13:53:06 |
|
Agnosticism is not a religion | by Nightwind | 2009-08-26 18:06:42 |
|
And this differs from the right-wing churches how? | by werehatrack | 2009-08-26 08:43:39 |
|
It doesn't necessarily differ | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 08:47:31 |
|
Then let the same voices be raised in outrage... | by werehatrack | 2009-08-26 08:51:35 |
|
That's fine with me. | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 08:54:49 |
|
I CHALLENGE YOU! | by SnArL | 2009-08-26 08:56:10 |
|
Hmmm... things've slowed down a bit here... :+) (n/t) | by adiplomat | 2009-08-26 09:36:37 |
|
I kept expecting him to say "pikachu" | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-26 09:40:33 |
|
AR-15, I choose you! (n/t) | by SnArL | 2009-08-26 09:47:31 |
|
Wonder Twin Powers - Form of - a J-SOW! | by adiplomat | 2009-08-26 09:53:09 |
|
nha, said is I want to know where this is from. (n/t) | by Nightwind | 2009-08-26 18:09:26 |
|
Oh... Just this: | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 08:50:37 |
|
Reading that, something strikes me. | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 08:56:34 |
|
Taxpayer funded at that | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 09:00:07 |
|
Modern tech; IM broadcast. or equivalent | by werehatrack | 2009-08-26 09:02:08 |
|
According to the main article | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 09:04:59 |
|
How many times did Bush Jr meet | by werehatrack | 2009-08-26 08:57:24 |
|
Data needed, without an example argument doesn't | by techi870 | 2009-08-26 09:02:08 |
|
Jeff Sharlet reported in a 2005 Harper's | by buddha | 2009-08-26 09:28:08 |
|
The unanswered question | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 09:35:55 |
|
Per my post below, | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 09:44:39 |
|
Well it wouldn't take a rocket scientist | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 10:06:56 |
|
If it's what I'm thinking of | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 10:13:34 |
|
Thanks, If UF has taught me nothing else, I've | by techi870 | 2009-08-26 09:38:56 |
|
Unless I misread it, all your article indicates is | by SaylorA | 2009-08-26 09:43:10 |
|
Just backing up the claim he met with right | by buddha | 2009-08-26 09:46:52 |
|
Fair enough. I had construed your post to imply | by SaylorA | 2009-08-26 09:49:36 |
|
None that I'm aware of. | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 09:02:55 |
|
Bush met with religious leaders most Mondays. | by werehatrack | 2009-08-26 09:42:41 |
|
While interesting, yet very tinfoil hatish | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 10:03:51 |
|
He didn't need to. | by JaR | 2009-08-26 10:36:22 |
|
I don't recall mention of any evidence for that. (n/t) | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 10:39:34 |
|
Let me see if I got this straight | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 10:53:33 |
|
I fail to see the difference. | by JaR | 2009-08-26 11:08:23 |
|
And why is it more palatable? | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 11:21:48 |
|
Nope. Altho your 1st statement is | by JaR | 2009-08-26 11:44:42 |
|
You should have known | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 11:59:36 |
|
Yup. In hindsight. My bad. (n/t) | by JaR | 2009-08-26 12:35:58 |
|
I had a head start | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 12:51:59 |
|
I have to question this | by Stuka | 2009-08-26 12:21:58 |
|
Hmmm | by JaR | 2009-08-26 12:48:33 |
|
The powers not delegated to the United States by | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 12:57:17 |
|
True enough. | by JaR | 2009-08-26 14:01:06 |
|
It's only because we allow it that it happens | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 14:20:50 |
|
Truth is, however, that we DO allow | by JaR | 2009-08-26 15:48:33 |
|
Actually some of those are constitutional. | by SaylorA | 2009-08-26 14:28:13 |
|
Just one question: | by kelli217 | 2009-08-26 13:16:36 |
|
He's gone a long way in 2 | by Stuka | 2009-08-26 14:28:14 |
|
Thought it was 2 auto makers | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 14:30:39 |
|
Couldn't remember about Chrysler | by Stuka | 2009-08-26 21:03:02 |
|
The seperation was never intended to remove | by SaylorA | 2009-08-26 11:48:08 |
|
Um, what about the "left wing" churches and | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-26 08:58:03 |
|
He may be asking them to support it | by aprylmae | 2009-08-26 09:18:17 |
|
True; however, | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 09:20:20 |
|
political figures always ask for support, | by aprylmae | 2009-08-26 09:29:02 |
|
The problem here lies though before | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-26 09:21:27 |
|
hmmm | by AprylMae | 2009-08-26 15:06:55 |
|
One thing that's interesting to me | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 09:23:28 |
|
It's the People's Front of Judea (n/t) | by bitflipper | 2009-08-26 09:45:22 |
|
:-D | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 09:46:46 |
|
Aw, man, you've missed out! | by bitflipper | 2009-08-26 09:48:38 |
|
Setting aside the religious aspect... | by Stuka | 2009-08-26 12:28:25 |
|
I like that approach | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 12:32:11 |
|
Let me see if I have this right. | by aprylmae | 2009-08-26 12:46:37 |
|
No, we don't. | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 12:50:38 |
|
Then why have a president at all? | by aprylmae | 2009-08-26 13:01:22 |
|
Strictly speaking, we don't elect a President | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 13:07:57 |
|
But to whom is blame assigned | by aprylmae | 2009-08-26 13:15:56 |
|
He shouldn't be. | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-26 13:19:19 |
|
Appealing to the legislators' constituents | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 12:44:57 |
|
can you think of a better way of | by aprylmae | 2009-08-26 12:56:35 |
|
I can think of more appropriate ones | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 13:03:26 |
|
I disagree | by aprylmae | 2009-08-26 13:08:08 |
|
specifically sent someone to do so for him... | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 13:18:48 |
|
not really | by aprylmae | 2009-08-26 13:28:13 |
|
really | by DesertRat66 | 2009-08-26 13:40:22 |