UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Philosophy Corner: Ontology	by MatthewDBA	2009-08-24 06:51:21
I think, therefore I am.	by kelli217	2009-08-24 11:55:37
What do you mean, "I am?"	by bitflipper	2009-08-24 12:11:30
That's exactly my point.	by kelli217	2009-08-24 12:33:18
Must it, though, or is it sufficient merely for it	by bitflipper	2009-08-24 13:20:32
to be capable of thought? Is a fish capable of thought? Is it capable of thinking "I?" Granted, there must be something to do the thinking, but, is it always necessary for that something to be aware that it is thinking? Is awareness of external stimuli and internal states such as hunger, injury, and illness enough for thought?
[ Reply ]

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)