UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Philosophy Corner: Ontology	by MatthewDBA	2009-08-24 06:51:21
I think, therefore I am.	by kelli217	2009-08-24 11:55:37
What do you mean, "I am?"	by bitflipper	2009-08-24 12:11:30
That's exactly my point.	by kelli217	2009-08-24 12:33:18
When I say that it may be possible to be, without thinking, that's what I'm talking about. Given thought, existence follows. Given existence, thought does not necessarily follow, but there is at least the possibility of thought, since those beings who think comprise a subset of those things that exist. Thought is possibly predicated on the existence not of a thing, but of an "I" to do the thinking. So, in order to have thought, maybe there must be a thing which is capable of a self-concept.
[ Reply ]
Given thought,	by MatthewDBA	2009-08-24 13:01:40
I've seen no convincing argument in favor of	by bitflipper	2009-08-24 13:14:53
Descartes pretty well established that.	by kelli217	2009-08-24 13:22:22
Must it, though, or is it sufficient merely for it	by bitflipper	2009-08-24 13:20:32

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)