| Which trumps: Society or the Law? |
by Illiad |
2009-08-24 09:49:34 |
| I've driven the I-5 (the Interstate that runs North-South through Washington State) quite a bit. Around the town of Bellingham (and it seems only around there) I've noticed an anomaly: the residents there seem to read "Yield" signs as if they were "Merge" signs.
This happens at the onramps. One could be happily tooling along on the Interstate at 60MPH, when suddenly the cars in front of you step on their brakes. They're doing this to avoid hitting the cars coming onto the I-5, even though the onramps are all governed by "Yield" signs.
In one instance I remember being forced over from the right lane to the left on the I-5 because an SUV shoved its way over from the onramp. The driver saw me clearly, and looked pretty annoyed that I hadn't cleared the lane for him earlier, despite him having a "Yield" sign.
On the other side of the coin, I approached the I-5 from an onramp once and heeded the "Yield" sign. I was there for all of five seconds when the car behind me leaned on his horn -- despite there being a steady stream of traffic on the Interstate. I waited until it was clear (another ten seconds or so) then away I went, all the while tailgated by the car behind me, horn still blaring away until he passed me. I think he might've given me the finger.
Which brings me to my question: with the understanding that it's always better to drive defensively and to not get into a fuss on the roads (hurtling metal being what it is), at what point is it better to ignore the law and just go with what everyone else is doing? |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Whichever avoids crashes. (n/t) | by veran | 2009-08-24 09:54:20 |
|
Well, safety of the person(s) in your own vehicle | by bitflipper | 2009-08-24 09:56:47 |
|
i think in a rear end collision | by robertltux | 2009-08-24 10:48:24 |
|
Not always. | by AndyA | 2009-08-24 11:01:11 |
|
True, but often it is left for the person doing | by SaylorA | 2009-08-24 11:16:43 |
|
It has to be pretty damn obvious for the cops. | by kahuana | 2009-08-24 16:12:32 |
|
and did the judge chuck it?? | by robertltux | 2009-08-24 16:34:40 |
|
In traffic, if society and the law conflict, | by hadji | 2009-08-24 09:57:50 |
|
But if they collide, wouldn't the one with | by merlin | 2009-08-24 10:00:51 |
|
Plus if he forced his way in and there was an | by techi870 | 2009-08-24 10:07:00 |
|
Safest would be M113 with a minigun trumps cars. (n/t) | by kahuana | 2009-08-24 16:04:45 |
|
It depends | by imrambi | 2009-08-24 09:59:45 |
|
The law. What you're describing is a failure | by subbywan | 2009-08-24 10:05:00 |
|
At some point though | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-24 10:08:12 |
|
Constantly. But that doesn't make it any smarter. | by subbywan | 2009-08-24 10:10:41 |
|
Agree, in this case, unless | by woodburn | 2009-08-24 10:12:52 |
|
This post confuses me. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-24 10:42:35 |
|
The law is stupid. | by woodburn | 2009-08-24 10:53:16 |
|
That only means people are stupid, not the law | by subbywan | 2009-08-24 10:54:22 |
|
True, people are stupid. But the law is stupider | by woodburn | 2009-08-24 10:57:37 |
|
The Law is created by people. Q.E.D. (n/t) | by merlin | 2009-08-24 11:11:42 |
|
So does that mean that the law is more dumb than | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-24 11:22:43 |
|
Well, they say committee's are as dumb as its dumb | by NDwight | 2009-08-24 11:27:22 |
|
IQ of dumbest member, divided by the # of members (n/t) | by subbywan | 2009-08-24 11:28:59 |
|
Much better. | by adiplomat | 2009-08-24 11:55:49 |
|
Woodburn, you're using "ligament" when you mean | by adiplomat | 2009-08-24 11:54:11 |
|
That was the tendoncy that threw me. | by kelli217 | 2009-08-24 12:01:30 |
|
Perhaps he answered off the rotator cuff? | by SnArL | 2009-08-24 12:04:04 |
|
my bad, thank you. (n/t) | by woodburn | 2009-08-24 12:17:43 |
|
Usually this is a valid argument in a court. | by vampire | 2009-08-24 10:28:13 |
|
Saftey, society and then the law. | by AndyA | 2009-08-24 10:05:46 |
|
Then there's the situation in which | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-24 10:09:28 |
|
Yes. See Illiads example. | by AndyA | 2009-08-24 10:23:36 |
|
Neither, safety should trump in that | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-24 10:17:28 |
|
And it's hard to argue right of way | by AndyA | 2009-08-24 10:24:54 |
|
laws of Physics trump everything | by robertltux | 2009-08-24 10:41:24 |
|
"Ye canna change th' laws o' physics!" | by adiplomat | 2009-08-24 13:09:23 |
|
Except the laws of mathematics. | by Jeff_UK | 2009-08-24 15:22:48 |
|
yeah well heres some math for you | by robertltux | 2009-08-24 15:55:21 |
|
Wow - yield, really? | by vw_fan17 | 2009-08-24 10:44:28 |
|
Sometimes people aren't checking their speed, | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-24 10:46:29 |
|
aka "They don't know how to drive." | by Twitchh | 2009-08-24 12:29:16 |
|
Again, | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-24 12:32:41 |
|
Solution: | by vw_fan17 | 2009-08-25 13:13:14 |
|
getting a license is hard for the wrong reasons | by Nightwind | 2009-08-24 14:17:32 |
|
I was never tested for parallel parking. | by kahuana | 2009-08-24 16:07:31 |
|
Most people merge like they've never seen a zipper (n/t) | by quilting_kitty | 2009-08-24 18:27:06 |
|
My two rules for driveing | by imWACC0 | 2009-08-24 10:57:46 |
|
My rules: | by SnArL | 2009-08-24 11:12:12 |
|
While I assume your rules are bike centric | by abaron | 2009-08-24 12:36:32 |
|
I do that too and it drives my friends and | by Classic_Jon | 2009-08-24 14:54:09 |
|
Diamonds. | by adiplomat | 2009-08-24 11:29:30 |
|
well, I didn't see *that* coming. | by MatthewDBA | 2009-08-24 11:30:07 |
|
There is, of course, an argument for spades. | by adiplomat | 2009-08-24 11:39:49 |
|
Somebody get me a club! I think I need to deck | by bitflipper | 2009-08-24 12:15:54 |
|
<whistfully...> Can't we build bridges instead of | by adiplomat | 2009-08-24 12:21:25 |
|
Ow, the pain. Someone pass me the gin! (n/t) | by bitflipper | 2009-08-24 12:27:58 |
|
Ya rummy! No hearts for the game? | by adiplomat | 2009-08-24 12:36:03 |
|
Well, we wouldn't want you to put all your eggs | by merlin | 2009-08-24 12:41:17 |
|
Someone please euchre-nize me and put me out of my | by bitflipper | 2009-08-24 13:26:51 |
|
Don't make me help you | by merlin | 2009-08-24 12:32:14 |
|
Silliness aside (ON UF?!?) Safety always. | by adiplomat | 2009-08-24 11:44:53 |
|
Both! It's the Law Society what does the trumping. (n/t) | by kahuana | 2009-08-24 16:02:05 |