The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Philosophy Corner: Ontology by MatthewDBA2009-08-24 06:51:21
  A self-evidential event of the subjective ego by bitflipper2009-08-24 07:26:49
    Would that imply that (for example) by MatthewDBA2009-08-24 07:37:08
      My take would be: by bitflipper2009-08-24 07:51:37
        That's not quite circular. by MatthewDBA 2009-08-24 08:02:26
We can't know that we're not thinking because we've defined thought to be a requirement for knowing anything. But does that tell us anything about thought?
[ Reply ]
          Sure; it tells us that thought is necessary by bitflipper2009-08-24 08:53:12
            "The presence of thought in another creature by MatthewDBA2009-08-24 09:03:30
              I doubt it by bitflipper2009-08-24 09:33:31
                That appears to be directly contradictory by MatthewDBA2009-08-24 09:35:26
                  Yes, I mis-stated it, earlier by bitflipper2009-08-24 09:50:33

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)