The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
Not Quite The UF Philosophy Corner by MatthewDBA2009-04-16 10:54:41
  I disagree. by Peace_man2009-04-16 11:58:41
    Something sounds not quite right about that by MatthewDBA2009-04-16 12:08:56
      Do we need to go back to defining what by Peace_man2009-04-16 12:46:37
        That is incorrect by subbywan2009-04-16 14:01:55
          I beg to differ. by Peace_man2009-04-16 14:19:28
            The purpose is to prevent wrong. by subbywan2009-04-16 14:25:12
              Maybe we need to see what the definition of by Peace_man2009-04-16 14:34:04
                No, because I believe in limiting certain freedoms by subbywan2009-04-16 14:40:18
                  Maybe we need to converge here. by Peace_man2009-04-16 14:47:09
                    That's because you believe we're entitled to by subbywan2009-04-16 14:51:05
                      Entitled? Maybe. Maybe it is just something that by Peace_man2009-04-16 14:59:23
                        Psychology disagrees there. by subbywan 2009-04-16 15:07:15
It breaks us up into multiple in/out groups, and notes we will always attend to the in-group need before we look at the out-group's needs - You won't let your family starve so others can eat - sure, you'll share, even if you go a little hungry, but you won't harm your family to support someone else. Similarly, you'll do the same thing for say, your blood relatives over extended family, country over another country, yourself over a co-worker, etc.

It's not to say you will harm the others - you will just look after whatever in-group you're a part of in a given situation first, and others after that.
[ Reply ]
                          True. by Peace_man2009-04-16 15:18:51
                            Not herrings at all. We've already stated the case by subbywan2009-04-16 15:22:46
                              Well, stated like that, we actually agree. by Peace_man2009-04-16 15:27:47
                                Yes. Good should be considered when creating by subbywan2009-04-16 15:30:37
                                And I have to agree - reluctantly :-) by Peace_man2009-04-16 15:40:16
                                you got the first 1/2 right :P by subbywan2009-04-16 15:48:38

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)