The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
Serious question for those against gay marriage. by Snate2009-04-15 12:37:15
  I think that most of these people by MatthewDBA2009-04-15 12:53:06
    I'm not so sure on A and I hope you're wrong on C by Snate2009-04-15 12:59:50
      Why would they abstain from voting by MatthewDBA 2009-04-15 13:02:24
on an issue that's important to them? I don't expect them to do that on any other issue.
[ Reply ]
        because it doesn't affect them? (n/t) by vdp2009-04-15 13:04:49
          Assuming they're open to rational arguments. by cuboci2009-04-15 13:09:15
          Except that in their belief, by MatthewDBA2009-04-15 13:10:26
            Congrats, Matt, you just broke my brain by SnArL2009-04-15 13:37:31
              When did civil marriage become a civil right? by toysbfun2009-04-15 13:42:00
                The premise is by DesertRat662009-04-15 13:46:17
                  The problem by kanth2009-04-15 13:49:39
                    Until someone successfully argues a 14th Amendment by DesertRat662009-04-15 13:56:43
                  So if the government announced all marriages were by toysbfun2009-04-15 13:53:41
                    Not the ones in the middle of divorcing by voxwoman2009-04-15 14:02:28
                      Couldn't medical power of attorney do that? (n/t) by toysbfun2009-04-15 14:07:32
                        I've just been through this with my father by voxwoman2009-04-15 14:12:43
                          Some states don't recognize marriage licenses by toysbfun2009-04-15 14:18:07
                    One would hope... by DesertRat662009-04-15 14:07:05
                      cynical, but it's likely true by sonja2009-04-15 15:28:18
            What about the multitudes who don't take Jesus as by voxwoman2009-04-15 13:39:58
              Why stop at two? (n/t) by toysbfun2009-04-15 13:43:40
                "I prefer three, but it's hard enough finding one" by voxwoman2009-04-15 13:48:54
                  *sets up a strawman* by SnArL2009-04-15 13:56:05
                  I see the issue as by toysbfun2009-04-15 14:05:50
                    So all couples wanting to get married have to be by Bellator2009-04-15 14:07:30
                      Some states already require blood tests. by toysbfun2009-04-15 14:13:57
                        And sex has to do with marriage what, exactly? by confused.brit2009-04-15 17:45:43
                    There are very good reasons for limiting by Peace_man2009-04-15 14:12:11
                    But it hasn't gone unchanged for centuries. by Arachnid2009-04-15 15:10:48
                      The number of people and what sex each person by toysbfun2009-04-15 15:15:34
                        "This is how we've always done it" by Arachnid2009-04-15 15:19:56
                          Any social custom started for a reason. by toysbfun2009-04-15 15:23:50
                            And that's still not a good argument. by Arachnid2009-04-15 15:29:49
                              I'm not saying I know the reason, merely that it by toysbfun2009-04-15 15:38:38
                                Saying that it "must exist" is a spurious by voxwoman2009-04-15 15:41:29
                                Everything has a reason behind it. by toysbfun2009-04-15 15:50:13
                                If everyone took your precautionary principle to by Arachnid2009-04-15 15:59:12
                                an anecdote from a relative by voxwoman2009-04-15 16:08:52
                                Exactly. If the pan had been passed down with the by toysbfun2009-04-15 16:12:41
                                the problem is the *reasons* rarely get passed on. (n/t) by morenna2009-04-15 17:01:20
                                Not necessarily. Change can be good. by toysbfun2009-04-15 16:11:07
              Actually, about whether Christians should take by Peace_man2009-04-15 14:07:41
                Matthew 28:19 flat out requires it. by Adiplomat2009-04-15 18:56:45
          peer by kanth2009-04-15 13:16:05
            How? by Bellator2009-04-15 13:32:08
              He's afraid of catching teh ghey. (n/t) by SnArL2009-04-15 13:38:25
                Ad Hominem's? Already (n/t) by kanth2009-04-15 13:42:08
                  Snark. Always. (n/t) by SnArL2009-04-15 13:54:28
              because all laws have a social affect by kanth2009-04-15 13:38:57
                It's the polite and neighborly thing to do by voxwoman2009-04-15 13:53:57
                  I'd give you a cookie... by SnArL2009-04-15 14:01:14
                  Perhaps by kanth2009-04-15 15:31:09
                Yes... you really should stay silent and look the by Bellator2009-04-15 13:56:25
                  Love thy neighbor... by SnArL2009-04-15 14:17:13
                  There's a reason why Catholics by krikkert2009-04-15 14:57:45
                  Loving your neighbor sometimes means by toysbfun2009-04-15 15:02:30
                    there's a difference between pointing out by voxwoman2009-04-15 15:46:56
                      Who's pointing a gun? by toysbfun2009-04-15 16:02:23
                  But the law by kanth2009-04-15 15:13:53

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)