|
10 Reasons to crusade against gay marriage: | by SnArL | 2009-04-14 10:14:20 |
|
The implication being if you are not for it | by vampire | 2009-04-14 10:24:45 |
|
Just like the arguments against gay marriage? | by Hieraco | 2009-04-14 10:28:07 |
|
That's not necessarily the case. | by MatthewDBA | 2009-04-14 10:31:14 |
|
Correct and I think I've done a fair job of | by vampire | 2009-04-14 10:36:52 |
|
I have yet to see an argument against it | by SnArL | 2009-04-14 10:40:04 |
|
That's assuming that | by MatthewDBA | 2009-04-14 10:47:30 |
|
It is also assuming that | by DesertRat66 | 2009-04-14 10:58:00 |
|
Matthew 19 and Romans 1 say different. | by Adiplomat | 2009-04-14 11:24:55 |
|
What's wrong with sodomy? | by Bellator | 2009-04-14 11:47:33 |
|
The same thing that is wrong with any of them. | by Adiplomat | 2009-04-14 12:00:11 |
|
Ok, so you're against that because God says so | by Bellator | 2009-04-14 12:06:33 |
|
No one's perfect, Bellator. Not even you. | by Adiplomat | 2009-04-14 13:03:01 |
| But allowing gay marriage doesn't FORCE you to do |
by SnArL |
2009-04-14 13:14:10 |
ANYTHING. It simply allows the legal avenue for those who wish to do so.
This is an honest, non-sarcastic question:
Do you believe that homosexual couples having homosexual sex behind closed doors affects you in some way?
The public declaration of a commitment to each other, in the form of marriage, ISN'T necessarily about sex. Some married couples DON'T have sex. (I'll refrain from making a joke about the current state of my parents' marriage).
But beyond that is a very serious point: Isn't it God's place to judge and not yours? |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
No, it does not. BUT, insisting that I vote | by Adiplomat | 2009-04-14 13:24:27 |
|
But there's already a law in place | by SnArL | 2009-04-14 13:42:44 |
|
Two things. First, an amendment is NOT a law. | by Adiplomat | 2009-04-14 13:58:11 |
|
The same thing applies. | by SnArL | 2009-04-14 14:25:49 |
|
No, placing God's Law above man's is precisely | by Adiplomat | 2009-04-14 14:48:10 |
|
So, you're saying that the Jews should've enforced | by SnArL | 2009-04-14 14:52:12 |
|
Actually, the Jews had exactly the right idea when | by Bellator | 2009-04-14 15:07:29 |
|
Correct. But remember that these are also | by Adiplomat | 2009-04-14 15:17:20 |
|
Yeah... | by Bellator | 2009-04-14 15:20:03 |
|
Never would. That's what you (meaning most in this | by Adiplomat | 2009-04-14 19:08:38 |
|
From each POV, that's what the other is doing | by DesiredUsername | 2009-04-14 19:57:51 |