UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

UF Philosophy Corner: Metaphysics	by MatthewDBA	2009-04-02 09:52:58
Basically I don't think therefore I am not	by Classic_Jon	2009-04-02 11:06:16
No, it means that	by MatthewDBA	2009-04-02 11:13:43
what about if the atoms make up molecules that	by Classic_Jon	2009-04-02 11:16:39
Since they're still atoms	by MatthewDBA	2009-04-02 11:17:03
they are no longer atoms on their own, they are	by Classic_Jon	2009-04-02 11:18:22
They're not atoms on their own	by MatthewDBA	2009-04-02 11:21:50
Molecules have a different behavior than a single	by Classic_Jon	2009-04-02 11:52:35
I'm not certain I follow you	by MatthewDBA	2009-04-02 12:02:03
If the actions of molecules are dependent on the actions of (and therefore relations between) their constituent atoms, then the argument seems to follow.
[ Reply ]
Does the molecule of sugar behave the same	by Classic_Jon	2009-04-02 14:24:17

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)