UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

pseudo philosophy question (and goodnight!)	by jaqie	2009-03-31 06:51:36
I should think that destruction requires movement	by PeKaJe	2009-03-31 07:47:46
Likely in multiple directions. Of course, one could argue that once destroyed, it's no longer that object, and the object was indeed immovable up to the point of impact (where it ceased to exist, having turned into a formerly immovable object). But then by that logic, every object in existence could be considered immovable. An interesting philosophical quandary, that. Of course, physics simply states that such things don't exist and leave it at that ... :-)
[ Reply ]
"When is an object not an object?" ;-)	by MatthewDBA	2009-03-31 08:03:05
It's definitely a classic one	by PeKaJe	2009-03-31 08:20:34
Indeterminable, or simply undetermined? (n/t)	by MatthewDBA	2009-03-31 08:24:44
Good question	by PeKaJe	2009-03-31 08:45:36

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)