|
Obama forgets the President of France | by vivianc | 2009-03-23 10:25:09 |
|
I'd be surprised if Obama ever saw that letter | by subbywan | 2009-03-23 10:47:47 |
|
I would have to still hold his staff and him | by Classic_Jon | 2009-03-23 10:52:18 |
|
Yes and no. | by subbywan | 2009-03-23 10:55:56 |
|
I agree to a point. If *I* were signing a very | by Classic_Jon | 2009-03-23 11:04:11 |
|
eh. Depends on how the other country takes it | by subbywan | 2009-03-23 11:13:35 |
|
I would agree with you except I have not seen it | by Classic_Jon | 2009-03-23 11:17:14 |
| True. If they were all mistakes. |
by subbywan |
2009-03-23 11:21:21 |
And they may well all be mistakes.
However, assuming they are, they certainly won't make us look any worse than we already are.
Assuming some of them aren't (though, I won't speculate which ones are/aren't), he could also be setting a new tone for international relations, more as friends and colleagues than stiff, formal dignitaries.
The ones I've heard of have all been with countries where our ambassadors really don't have much to do, because the POTUS deals directly with the head of that Govt.
Obviously, calling your counterpart by the wrong name is unlikely to be such a thing :P but in relation to some of the others, perhaps.
|
|
[ Reply ] |
|
But that is kind of my point, if you are trying to | by Classic_Jon | 2009-03-23 11:29:02 |
|
Perhaps ... I'm going to wait and see how it plays | by subbywan | 2009-03-23 11:33:21 |
|
All I am asking for is equal vilification by the | by Classic_Jon | 2009-03-23 11:58:14 |
|
For unequal acts? :P that's hardly fair :P (n/t) | by subbywan | 2009-03-23 12:00:11 |
|
They staked Quayle out for a formerly | by Classic_Jon | 2009-03-23 12:04:23 |
|
that is true. | by subbywan | 2009-03-23 12:06:06 |
|
When he was in school...that was valid | by Classic_Jon | 2009-03-23 12:10:36 |
|
Really?? You poor poor man! (n/t) | by subbywan | 2009-03-23 12:13:25 |
|
Talk about how to confuse a 3rd/4th | by Classic_Jon | 2009-03-23 12:19:04 |
