|
Obama forgets the President of France | by vivianc | 2009-03-23 10:25:09 |
| I'd be surprised if Obama ever saw that letter |
by subbywan |
2009-03-23 10:47:47 |
other than to sign it, along with a small mountain of similar ones.
Come on folks ... You're having to resort to nit-picking mistakes by the clerical staff to find things you don't like about him?
|
|
[ Reply ] |
|
I would have to still hold his staff and him | by Classic_Jon | 2009-03-23 10:52:18 |
|
Exactly. Besides, the boss is responsible | by Adiplomat | 2009-03-23 10:55:26 |
|
Responsibility doesn't mean causation though. (n/t | by subbywan | 2009-03-23 10:56:39 |
|
Why not? Didn't he appoint them? | by vivianc | 2009-03-23 11:04:15 |
|
Probably, not no. | by subbywan | 2009-03-23 11:09:38 |
|
That brings up a question then. If the same staff | by Classic_Jon | 2009-03-23 11:14:37 |
|
That possibility had crossed my mind. | by subbywan | 2009-03-23 11:23:45 |
|
Agreed, many things happened here | by Classic_Jon | 2009-03-23 11:30:59 |
|
In this case, agreed. (n/t) | by subbywan | 2009-03-23 11:33:54 |
|
Yes and no. | by subbywan | 2009-03-23 10:55:56 |
|
The gardenias are writing memos? :+) (n/t) | by Adiplomat | 2009-03-23 10:58:28 |
|
No silly! | by subbywan | 2009-03-23 11:10:21 |
|
*Blames it all on "The Shrubs"* | by Classic_Jon | 2009-03-23 12:37:58 |
|
I agree to a point. If *I* were signing a very | by Classic_Jon | 2009-03-23 11:04:11 |
|
eh. Depends on how the other country takes it | by subbywan | 2009-03-23 11:13:35 |
|
I would agree with you except I have not seen it | by Classic_Jon | 2009-03-23 11:17:14 |
|
True. If they were all mistakes. | by subbywan | 2009-03-23 11:21:21 |
|
But that is kind of my point, if you are trying to | by Classic_Jon | 2009-03-23 11:29:02 |
|
Perhaps ... I'm going to wait and see how it plays | by subbywan | 2009-03-23 11:33:21 |
|
All I am asking for is equal vilification by the | by Classic_Jon | 2009-03-23 11:58:14 |
|
For unequal acts? :P that's hardly fair :P (n/t) | by subbywan | 2009-03-23 12:00:11 |
|
They staked Quayle out for a formerly | by Classic_Jon | 2009-03-23 12:04:23 |
|
that is true. | by subbywan | 2009-03-23 12:06:06 |
|
When he was in school...that was valid | by Classic_Jon | 2009-03-23 12:10:36 |
|
Really?? You poor poor man! (n/t) | by subbywan | 2009-03-23 12:13:25 |
|
Talk about how to confuse a 3rd/4th | by Classic_Jon | 2009-03-23 12:19:04 |
|
Jon, I know it sometimes seems worth it, | by Adiplomat | 2009-03-23 11:26:17 |
|
Sometimes Subby has some valid points though | by Classic_Jon | 2009-03-23 12:40:29 |
|
That seems to be a problem of his. | by vivianc | 2009-03-23 11:01:05 |
|
If it is ignorance, yes. | by subbywan | 2009-03-23 11:07:32 |
|
Add Hugo Chavez to the list of people who said it. (n/t) | by DesertRat66 | 2009-03-23 11:14:31 |
|
You're not actually stregthening your argument | by Adiplomat | 2009-03-23 11:16:29 |
|
Just saying... | by DesertRat66 | 2009-03-23 11:17:29 |
|
Touche! (n/t) | by Adiplomat | 2009-03-23 11:18:15 |
|
But, by THAT argument, | by subbywan | 2009-03-23 11:26:12 |
|
Well I am | by DesertRat66 | 2009-03-23 13:05:16 |
|
Right, because the US media isn't going to... | by vivianc | 2009-03-23 11:38:39 |
|
They gaffe plenty | by subbywan | 2009-03-23 11:41:08 |
|
It also doesn't hurt... | by vivianc | 2009-03-23 11:43:36 |
|
um ... and? | by subbywan | 2009-03-23 11:45:51 |
|
I very much doubt ignorance is a reason/ | by Adiplomat | 2009-03-23 11:09:50 |
|
You weren't elected POTUS for the opposition :P (n (n/t) | by subbywan | 2009-03-23 11:28:32 |
|
POTUS is POTUS for the whole country. | by firehawk | 2009-03-23 14:38:53 |
|
Yes, but many Americans don't see it that way. | by subbywan | 2009-03-23 14:59:33 |
|
Yes, and that's my point. | by firehawk | 2009-03-23 19:08:39 |
|
You can get in trouble for dissing a ufie. | by vetitice | 2009-03-23 14:50:30 |
