UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

"Slow Down the Political Response...	by jdelphiki	2009-02-10 06:37:29
I was thinking quite a bit of the same thing	by Classic_Jon	2009-02-10 07:04:24
Selective listening?	by vdp	2009-02-10 07:43:33
But, you have to admit that the majority of it	by Classic_Jon	2009-02-10 08:19:01
No, the majority of it was on the stimulus package	by vdp	2009-02-10 09:40:53
You sort of answered my question but dodged the	by Classic_Jon	2009-02-10 10:48:34
Were you expecting an informational session on how	by vdp	2009-02-10 11:36:40
I disagree and you still have not answerd my	by Classic_Jon	2009-02-10 11:51:07
question. The first words out of President Obamas mouth in the press conference were: "THE PRESIDENT: Good evening, everybody. Please be seated. Before I take your questions tonight, I'd like to speak briefly about the state of our economy and why I believe we need to put this recovery plan in motion as soon as possible." (the ** are mine) from here: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/PressConferencebythePreside nt/ Even your link to CNN says "Transcript: Obama takes questions on economy" If he was not going to talk aobut the Economy as a whole, why make that his opening statement, why would the press say the same thing? Again, What do we now know that we did not before the press conference? Why have this press conference if the Sec of the treasury is going to speak on it today in detail? What purpose did having Obama having a press conference serve if they are jsut goign to have another one that actually answeres questions the next day? On your second point: How am I jumping from topic to topic? I have asked the same question since my first post? "I also don't understand why Obama had a press conference aobut the Economy when he kept saying he was not going to go into specifics on it and let his people who were going to have a press conference later on it talk about the details. That made him sound uninformed on every economic policy question...which was the whole supposed point of the press conference I thought.... If he was not going to go into details on it...what was the purpose of the press conference?" I seem to see a running thread of me asking what the purpose of the press conference was if they are going to go into detail today. How is stating the same question jumping from topic to topic?
[ Reply ]
Read it again	by vdp	2009-02-10 13:06:24
If that is not part of the Economy, what is it a	by Classic_Jon	2009-02-10 13:49:53
One last bit, and I am done	by vdp	2009-02-10 14:52:53
Fair enough. I agree with the sentement	by Classic_Jon	2009-02-10 15:13:30

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)