Did you *read* the article?
I wasn't following a money trail of conservative contributors when I found, and linked, the article. I thought it was an interesting, thought-provoking summary of five events where our blindness to knee-jerk politics led us into greater chaos. I don't even necessarily agree with him entirely, but it seemed like a good analysis for discussion, especially since it was written pretty evenly, criticizing presidents from (and Congresses controlled by) both parties.
Is it too much to ask that you, at least, *consider* the content of a post or link before trying to undermine its source? |
