|
What was that people said about properly vetting | by Classic_Jon | 2009-02-03 12:21:00 |
|
I think a friend nailed it... | by DesertRat66 | 2009-02-03 12:30:25 |
|
At least they still slink off when caught. | by esbita | 2009-02-03 12:58:59 |
|
But will they be held accountable is the real | by Classic_Jon | 2009-02-03 13:03:27 |
|
Really? Do you have evidence that they | by vdp | 2009-02-03 13:06:51 |
|
I love how you just jumped off a cliff with that. | by Classic_Jon | 2009-02-03 13:20:44 |
|
Maybe I misread, but since all of them have | by vdp | 2009-02-03 13:25:52 |
|
Give you an example of myself. | by Classic_Jon | 2009-02-03 13:40:08 |
|
Why? | by vdp | 2009-02-03 14:21:41 |
|
Normally, if you file a *large* amendment | by Classic_Jon | 2009-02-03 14:31:11 |
|
Yes, interest and fees were charged | by vdp | 2009-02-03 15:51:57 |
|
Perhaps you missed this? | by DesertRat66 | 2009-02-03 17:22:13 |
|
No, I didn't | by vdp | 2009-02-03 20:23:03 |
|
Only for 2003 and 2004 | by DesertRat66 | 2009-02-03 20:50:22 |
| And how many angels can dance on a tax form? |
by firehawk |
2009-02-03 23:25:55 |
It's unmitigated snark, which seems to be the only form of criticism that some can offer.
Daschle and one other withdrew, Obama admitted he screwed up (see my other post for a link), and we finally have a President who admits mistakes and moves to correct them.
How does a "prank law" getting proposed, or snarking all over the current President, do anything productive for American government or society?
I have to bring up again that you've complained many times about the "hatred" (which is actually snark blown out of proportion) and lack of respect directed at the Bush Administration. You're doing the SAME THING. It doesn't make it right because "they started it" or "but he's a liberal".
If you expect to be taken seriously, please stop.
A snark for a snark makes the whole political spectrum useless. |
|
[ Reply ] |
