|
What was that people said about properly vetting | by Classic_Jon | 2009-02-03 12:21:00 |
| I think a friend nailed it... |
by DesertRat66 |
2009-02-03 12:30:25 |
| "So I think I see how Obama is planning on financing his New Deal programs...he's going to force bigtime tax dodgers to pay up by...offering them cabinet positions?" |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
*snerk* (n/t) | by archnerd | 2009-02-03 12:57:59 |
|
At least they still slink off when caught. | by esbita | 2009-02-03 12:58:59 |
|
But will they be held accountable is the real | by Classic_Jon | 2009-02-03 13:03:27 |
|
Really? Do you have evidence that they | by vdp | 2009-02-03 13:06:51 |
|
I love how you just jumped off a cliff with that. | by Classic_Jon | 2009-02-03 13:20:44 |
|
Maybe I misread, but since all of them have | by vdp | 2009-02-03 13:25:52 |
|
Give you an example of myself. | by Classic_Jon | 2009-02-03 13:40:08 |
|
Why? | by vdp | 2009-02-03 14:21:41 |
|
Normally, if you file a *large* amendment | by Classic_Jon | 2009-02-03 14:31:11 |
|
Yes, interest and fees were charged | by vdp | 2009-02-03 15:51:57 |
|
Perhaps you missed this? | by DesertRat66 | 2009-02-03 17:22:13 |
|
No, I didn't | by vdp | 2009-02-03 20:23:03 |
|
Only for 2003 and 2004 | by DesertRat66 | 2009-02-03 20:50:22 |
|
And how many angels can dance on a tax form? | by firehawk | 2009-02-03 23:25:55 |
|
This recently introduced bill | by DesertRat66 | 2009-02-03 13:49:26 |
|
Interesting, I did not know that. (n/t) | by Classic_Jon | 2009-02-03 13:55:05 |
|
Less snark, more substance, please. | by firehawk | 2009-02-03 17:29:09 |
|
Less snark, more substance, please. (n/t) | by DesiredUsername | 2009-02-03 19:58:32 |
|
Please follow the link the read the story. | by firehawk | 2009-02-03 23:01:39 |
|
Sure, but there's still snark in your comment (n/t) | by DesiredUsername | 2009-02-03 23:13:27 |
|
But at least there's substance with it. | by firehawk | 2009-02-03 23:47:00 |
