The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
<Deleted><Deleted>2008-10-21 12:41:35
  They sound confident by imrambi2008-10-21 11:43:13
    "Probably" is appropriate. by Illiad2008-10-21 11:52:27
      If there was scientific proof ... by PeKaJe 2008-10-21 12:20:58
... would it really be a God? My definition of a God is a being that operates outside any and all physical laws (of all universes). Therefore, any proof given would either be fake or move the so-called God from the realm of the supernatural to the real world where we could actually study it without superstition. I therefore feel justified in stating that there is no God as specified by most major religions. If convincing evidence comes forward for the existence of a supreme being (e.g. the operator of the computer our universe is being simulated in), then I for one will welcome it, and I won't be burdened by the ancient stories of men.
[ Reply ]
        Depends on what you take as by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 12:24:38
          Did I state that? by PeKaJe2008-10-21 12:32:20
        Exactly as you put it: by Illiad2008-10-21 12:25:23
          Though, if a being fits the descriptions set by CynicalRyan2008-10-21 12:29:53
            I would tend to disagree by PeKaJe2008-10-21 12:39:55
              Why need it be by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 12:43:12
                An omipotent concience by PeKaJe2008-10-21 12:53:16
                  Ever played the game of Go? by CynicalRyan2008-10-21 12:54:38
                    Never played it by PeKaJe2008-10-21 13:02:51
                      Which doesn't make the rules governing the system by CynicalRyan2008-10-21 13:04:35
                  I don't see why by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 12:59:35
                    It's the sentient ultimate God I'm arguing against by PeKaJe2008-10-21 13:11:57
                      I seem to be missing something by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 13:26:22
                        Not exactly sure how to explain that by PeKaJe2008-10-21 13:39:16
                          I'm not understanding by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 13:44:38
                            Just an observation from our universe by PeKaJe2008-10-21 13:55:57
                              And on that note, it's off to bed ... (n/t) by PeKaJe2008-10-21 14:02:03
              Yes, it is reasonable. by CynicalRyan2008-10-21 12:48:23
                I'm not exactly excluding the option by PeKaJe2008-10-21 13:00:24
                  With that, I fully agree. by CynicalRyan2008-10-21 13:01:24
                    Of course, this is all very hypothetical by PeKaJe2008-10-21 13:19:10
          The bable fish is proof of God so he doesn't exist by AndyA2008-10-21 12:56:12
            If that is a physical propert of a God ... by PeKaJe2008-10-21 13:23:13

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)