The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

<Deleted><Deleted>2008-10-21 12:41:35
  They sound confident by imrambi2008-10-21 11:43:13
    "Probably" is appropriate. by Illiad 2008-10-21 11:52:27
IMO, anyway.

Atheists are (generally) rationalists. They draw their conclusion that there probably isn't a God1 because there is no evidence of one. So they move through life with the assumption there is no God, but should evidence come to light supporting His existence, they'll re-examine their position. In other words, "show me the money!"

Then you get the "strong" atheists who are less than rational and move towards fundamentalist thinking. Their position is that they know there is no God, which is a real trick since they're claiming absolute knowledge about something. In other words, even in the face of evidence supporting the existence of (a) God, they intend to argue that it's a trick, or misleading or what-have-you. More on strong and weak atheism here.

1 "God" not only covers the Big Three patriarchal, transcendent Gods, but also various other gods, including Jeff, God of Biscuits.

[ Reply ]
      Excuse me? "even in the face of evidence" ? by Divinar2008-10-21 12:04:14
        Hypothetical evidence. Step away from the keyboard (n/t) by Jeff_UK2008-10-21 12:06:21
        Proof of (a) God's existence. by CynicalRyan2008-10-21 12:06:51
        If asking Illiad what he has been smoking by AndyA2008-10-21 12:13:03
        See what AndyA and others have said. by Illiad2008-10-21 12:17:21
          Thinking is anathema to userfriendly! by Jeff_UK2008-10-21 12:20:43
        There probably aren't Leprechauns either. (n/t) by run.dll2008-10-21 14:32:30
          Yes, indeed. by bitflipper2008-10-21 14:57:17
        Please don't be confused as to why by bitflipper2008-10-21 14:55:04
          Reminds me of The Piranha Brothers by run.dll2008-10-21 17:04:46
      If there was scientific proof ... by PeKaJe2008-10-21 12:20:58
        Depends on what you take as by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 12:24:38
          Did I state that? by PeKaJe2008-10-21 12:32:20
        Exactly as you put it: by Illiad2008-10-21 12:25:23
          Though, if a being fits the descriptions set by CynicalRyan2008-10-21 12:29:53
            I would tend to disagree by PeKaJe2008-10-21 12:39:55
              Why need it be by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 12:43:12
                An omipotent concience by PeKaJe2008-10-21 12:53:16
                  Ever played the game of Go? by CynicalRyan2008-10-21 12:54:38
                    Never played it by PeKaJe2008-10-21 13:02:51
                      Which doesn't make the rules governing the system by CynicalRyan2008-10-21 13:04:35
                  I don't see why by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 12:59:35
                    It's the sentient ultimate God I'm arguing against by PeKaJe2008-10-21 13:11:57
                      I seem to be missing something by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 13:26:22
                        Not exactly sure how to explain that by PeKaJe2008-10-21 13:39:16
                          I'm not understanding by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 13:44:38
                            Just an observation from our universe by PeKaJe2008-10-21 13:55:57
                              And on that note, it's off to bed ... (n/t) by PeKaJe2008-10-21 14:02:03
              Yes, it is reasonable. by CynicalRyan2008-10-21 12:48:23
                I'm not exactly excluding the option by PeKaJe2008-10-21 13:00:24
                  With that, I fully agree. by CynicalRyan2008-10-21 13:01:24
                    Of course, this is all very hypothetical by PeKaJe2008-10-21 13:19:10
          The bable fish is proof of God so he doesn't exist by AndyA2008-10-21 12:56:12
            If that is a physical propert of a God ... by PeKaJe2008-10-21 13:23:13

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)