|
UF Philosophy Corner - Ethics | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-21 08:21:28 |
|
In order: | by werehatrack | 2008-10-21 08:35:19 |
|
I like all but the first. | by tallastro | 2008-10-21 08:48:31 |
|
I'd agree with tallastro's definition,... | by bitflipper | 2008-10-21 09:30:59 |
|
Heinlein said it best, I think | by subbywan | 2008-10-21 09:55:24 |
|
Is it possible to have | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-21 10:03:46 |
|
That's not what he's saying. | by subbywan | 2008-10-21 10:10:06 |
|
Well, I'd say that | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-21 10:14:17 |
|
What gives them that right? (n/t) | by subbywan | 2008-10-21 10:15:39 |
|
Why must a right be "given"? | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-21 10:16:14 |
|
Based on what? | by subbywan | 2008-10-21 10:21:40 |
|
That depends on | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-21 10:33:23 |
|
scientific evidence, or faith-based? (n/t) | by subbywan | 2008-10-21 10:50:07 |
|
Are those my only two choices? (n/t) | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-21 10:51:44 |
|
Not if you can think of more. (n/t) | by subbywan | 2008-10-21 10:52:47 |
|
Evidence that rights are | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-21 10:56:36 |
|
That's a non-answer though. | by subbywan | 2008-10-21 11:06:32 |
| Where did laws come into it? |
by MatthewDBA |
2008-10-21 11:10:48 |
Or the desire to apply something to folk other than yourself?
What I'm saying is essentially that we appear to have different definitions of "human". In my mind, matters of definition are different from matters of faith, in that matters of definition affect relationships between concepts, whereas matters of faith don't. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
No, i think we have the same idea of "human" | by subbywan | 2008-10-21 11:16:39 |
|
That's not how I see a human. | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-21 11:24:51 |
|
I have no argument with that. | by subbywan | 2008-10-21 11:28:31 |
|
Again, that gets into a definition of "soul" | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-21 11:38:26 |
|
What makes them rights? | by subbywan | 2008-10-21 11:41:44 |
|
That's how I define the word, yes. | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-21 11:48:56 |
|
Assuming that is true | by subbywan | 2008-10-21 11:51:13 |
|
Going with my definition elsewhere | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-21 12:05:10 |
|
Which isn't germaine to the discussion though. | by subbywan | 2008-10-21 12:41:31 |
|
It's not irrelevant | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-21 12:48:23 |
|
Then what makes it wrong to define a right | by subbywan | 2008-10-21 13:02:19 |
|
One could argue that for any word | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-21 13:05:54 |
|
But other people can define it according to | by subbywan | 2008-10-21 13:25:36 |