The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
UF Philosophy Corner - Ethics by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 08:21:28
  In order: by werehatrack2008-10-21 08:35:19
    I like all but the first. by tallastro2008-10-21 08:48:31
      I'd agree with tallastro's definition,... by bitflipper2008-10-21 09:30:59
        Heinlein said it best, I think by subbywan2008-10-21 09:55:24
          Is it possible to have by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 10:03:46
            That's not what he's saying. by subbywan2008-10-21 10:10:06
              Well, I'd say that by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 10:14:17
                What gives them that right? (n/t) by subbywan2008-10-21 10:15:39
                  Why must a right be "given"? by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 10:16:14
                    Based on what? by subbywan2008-10-21 10:21:40
                      That depends on by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 10:33:23
                        scientific evidence, or faith-based? (n/t) by subbywan2008-10-21 10:50:07
                          Are those my only two choices? (n/t) by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 10:51:44
                            Not if you can think of more. (n/t) by subbywan2008-10-21 10:52:47
                              Evidence that rights are by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 10:56:36
                                That's a non-answer though. by subbywan 2008-10-21 11:06:32
"It's part of being human"
"why?"
"because it is"
"why is it though?"
"It just is"

If anything, that would make it a matter of faith. It is, because we believe it is.

That is fine for the individual, but as argued previously, if you want something to apply to folk other than yourself, one needs to have more than mere faith, particularly if you're trying to make laws based off of it.

Faith-based laws are dangerous and should be avoided worse than the plague.

[ Reply ]
                                Where did laws come into it? by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 11:10:48
                                No, i think we have the same idea of "human" by subbywan2008-10-21 11:16:39
                                That's not how I see a human. by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 11:24:51
                                I have no argument with that. by subbywan2008-10-21 11:28:31
                                Again, that gets into a definition of "soul" by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 11:38:26
                                What makes them rights? by subbywan2008-10-21 11:41:44
                                That's how I define the word, yes. by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 11:48:56
                                Assuming that is true by subbywan2008-10-21 11:51:13
                                Going with my definition elsewhere by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 12:05:10
                                Which isn't germaine to the discussion though. by subbywan2008-10-21 12:41:31
                                It's not irrelevant by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 12:48:23
                                Then what makes it wrong to define a right by subbywan2008-10-21 13:02:19
                                One could argue that for any word by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 13:05:54
                                But other people can define it according to by subbywan2008-10-21 13:25:36

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)