|
UF Philosophy Corner - Ethics | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-21 08:21:28 |
|
In order: | by werehatrack | 2008-10-21 08:35:19 |
|
I like all but the first. | by tallastro | 2008-10-21 08:48:31 |
|
I'd agree with tallastro's definition,... | by bitflipper | 2008-10-21 09:30:59 |
|
Heinlein said it best, I think | by subbywan | 2008-10-21 09:55:24 |
|
Is it possible to have | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-21 10:03:46 |
|
That's not what he's saying. | by subbywan | 2008-10-21 10:10:06 |
|
Well, I'd say that | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-21 10:14:17 |
|
What gives them that right? (n/t) | by subbywan | 2008-10-21 10:15:39 |
|
Why must a right be "given"? | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-21 10:16:14 |
|
Based on what? | by subbywan | 2008-10-21 10:21:40 |
|
That depends on | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-21 10:33:23 |
|
scientific evidence, or faith-based? (n/t) | by subbywan | 2008-10-21 10:50:07 |
|
Are those my only two choices? (n/t) | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-21 10:51:44 |
|
Not if you can think of more. (n/t) | by subbywan | 2008-10-21 10:52:47 |
| Evidence that rights are |
by MatthewDBA |
2008-10-21 10:56:36 |
inherent in the fact of being human? That statement is part of my understanding of what it means to be a human being, and so it's "pre-evidential," if there is such a word. It follows from my definition of a human.
But that may be better treated as a separate question - or, alternatively, it could be that we could start a discussion now and fill it out later on. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
That's a non-answer though. | by subbywan | 2008-10-21 11:06:32 |
|
Where did laws come into it? | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-21 11:10:48 |
|
No, i think we have the same idea of "human" | by subbywan | 2008-10-21 11:16:39 |
|
That's not how I see a human. | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-21 11:24:51 |
|
I have no argument with that. | by subbywan | 2008-10-21 11:28:31 |
|
Again, that gets into a definition of "soul" | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-21 11:38:26 |
|
What makes them rights? | by subbywan | 2008-10-21 11:41:44 |
|
That's how I define the word, yes. | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-21 11:48:56 |
|
Assuming that is true | by subbywan | 2008-10-21 11:51:13 |
|
Going with my definition elsewhere | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-21 12:05:10 |
|
Which isn't germaine to the discussion though. | by subbywan | 2008-10-21 12:41:31 |
|
It's not irrelevant | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-21 12:48:23 |
|
Then what makes it wrong to define a right | by subbywan | 2008-10-21 13:02:19 |
|
One could argue that for any word | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-21 13:05:54 |
|
But other people can define it according to | by subbywan | 2008-10-21 13:25:36 |