The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

UF Philosophy Corner - Ethics by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 08:21:28
  Rights vs Privileges by subbywan 2008-10-21 09:50:23
A right is something that is so inherent to us as humans that it cannot be taken away by another human, without fundamentally altering the human in question.

An example would be the right to pursue happiness. No one can take that away from you. They can beat you, lock you up, etc, but they can't stop you from trying to find happiness where ever you are.

No, there can not be true rights external to a society. Rights are internal to all societies, whether they exercise them or not.

No. True rights exist whether people recognize them or not.

There is a huge difference between rights and privileges. Rights can not be privileges and privileges can not be true rights.

The US Constitution guarantees US citizens certain "rights". These, however, are entirely conditional, generally upon good behaviour.

You have the right to free speech and freedom of expression, as long as you don't yell fire in a theater, or spread naked pics of children.

You have the right to firearms, unless you're convicted of certain felonies.

You have the right to vote, unless convicted of certain felonies.

You have the right to privacy, unless there's a search warrant involved.

The list goes on and on. You only have these "rights", as long as you behave in a certain way.

As such, they're privileges, not true rights. They are granted to you preemptively, and remain yours as long as you toe the proverbial line. Cross the line, and the privilege is revoked.

[ Reply ]
    I'm not sure of what you're saying in one respect by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 09:55:38
      Don't mind at all. by subbywan2008-10-21 09:59:03
        Would you say then by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 10:05:06
          Not necessarily, depending on what you mean by by subbywan2008-10-21 10:12:01
            If no other person ever interacts with the hermit by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 10:15:37
              Only if he gives them to himself, and can by subbywan2008-10-21 10:16:09
                It just seems odd to me by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 10:17:05
                  You're qualifying. by subbywan2008-10-21 10:22:31
                    They're not? by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 10:31:08
                      Doesn't mean there isn't one though. by subbywan2008-10-21 10:53:48
                        Except that by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 11:00:15
                          Much like two wrongs don't make a right by subbywan2008-10-21 11:09:29
                            I think maybe I was misunderstanding by MatthewDBA2008-10-21 11:17:11
        and to really twist this by robertltux2008-10-21 10:40:09
          Only what they can enforce for themselves. (n/t) by subbywan2008-10-21 10:54:24

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)