| U.S. Elections Thread (n/t) |
by merlin |
2008-10-21 09:37:35 |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Is it an "income tax cut" or a "payroll tax cut"? | by merlin | 2008-10-21 09:38:24 |
|
Wow, buy the election, then worry about where the | by NDwight | 2008-10-21 09:46:40 |
|
No worries. :-) | by DesiredUsername | 2008-10-21 10:46:56 |
|
Despite the obvious bias of that op-ed | by Peace_man | 2008-10-21 11:29:03 |
|
For certain definitions of support (n/t) | by rfrovarp | 2008-10-21 11:47:38 |
|
Ahh, McCain took the public money and is limited | by rfrovarp | 2008-10-21 11:55:51 |
|
Which Obama promised to do too, and didn't (n/t) | by DesertRat66 | 2008-10-21 12:10:46 |
|
McCain is limited in total budget? | by Peace_man | 2008-10-21 12:17:41 |
|
I'm not entirely sure | by rfrovarp | 2008-10-21 12:23:45 |
|
*blink blink* wow, that's rather stupid | by Freakazoid | 2008-10-21 09:56:14 |
|
If you actually read the editorial... | by esbita | 2008-10-21 09:59:06 |
|
That's why he wants to rack up the taxes | by merlin | 2008-10-21 10:01:45 |
|
Yeah, but it doesn't FEEL like welfare... | by retiqlum2 | 2008-10-21 10:40:36 |
|
But that would mean that *both* candidates | by Classic_Jon | 2008-10-21 10:42:59 |
|
Sorry, my fault. | by retiqlum2 | 2008-10-21 10:56:58 |
|
People...actually thinking...what will the Sheeple | by Classic_Jon | 2008-10-21 11:00:27 |
|
More to the point... | by jdelphiki | 2008-10-21 10:48:29 |
|
One thing I don't quite understand. | by Peace_man | 2008-10-21 11:14:27 |
|
Slight clarification... | by jdelphiki | 2008-10-21 12:41:31 |
|
Earn more than what? | by Peace_man | 2008-10-21 13:27:44 |
|
The point is this gives the worker MORE THAN | by merlin | 2008-10-21 13:32:09 |
|
Is it fair to let people starve to death | by Peace_man | 2008-10-21 13:44:40 |
|
I would kindly thank you to not put words in | by merlin | 2008-10-21 13:59:32 |
|
When you propose alternatives, I will | by Peace_man | 2008-10-21 14:04:08 |
|
Real simple, leave it alone | by merlin | 2008-10-21 14:13:45 |
|
If that is your alternative plan, can you show me | by Peace_man | 2008-10-21 14:23:39 |
|
Can you show me how Obama's plan | by merlin | 2008-10-21 15:06:48 |
|
Back on topic | by DesiredUsername | 2008-10-21 15:23:20 |
|
It seems that he will make this tax progressive. | by Peace_man | 2008-10-21 15:29:02 |
|
Question: | by DesiredUsername | 2008-10-21 13:53:05 |
|
It all depends on which of the various | by merlin | 2008-10-21 13:55:05 |
|
But I don't think you can 'factor that in'. | by DesiredUsername | 2008-10-21 14:32:43 |
|
Oh, I'll agree that I have overall issues with SS | by merlin | 2008-10-21 15:07:35 |
|
Yup. Eliminating *income* taxes on poor, okay. | by esbita | 2008-10-21 10:56:10 |
|
Yeah, I don't hold with negative tax rates. | by jmaxsohmer | 2008-10-21 11:19:50 |
|
I did read the article | by Freakazoid | 2008-10-21 10:07:11 |
|
Then you must have missed the part where | by merlin | 2008-10-21 10:14:33 |
|
And if net revenue is negative? | by Stibbons | 2008-10-21 10:18:04 |
|
Then we just "borrow" from the trust fund, | by chanceslost | 2008-10-21 10:29:20 |
|
ummm... whose trust fund? not mine! | by Classic_Jon | 2008-10-21 10:32:20 |
|
There is no trust fund, it just part of the | by NDwight | 2008-10-21 10:38:47 |
|
ahhh so the deficit gets the bill...ok long as it | by Classic_Jon | 2008-10-21 10:40:46 |
|
Sure it's a trust fund | by rfrovarp | 2008-10-21 10:58:44 |
|
Wow...just wow. I know it is an editorial | by Classic_Jon | 2008-10-21 10:21:37 |
|
Additionally, anyone have anything on Mccain | by Classic_Jon | 2008-10-21 10:31:15 |
|
Old article | by rfrovarp | 2008-10-21 10:53:26 |
|
Why doesn't he have a search feature? | by rfrovarp | 2008-10-21 11:08:20 |
|
Interesting quote: | by retiqlum2 | 2008-10-21 10:35:10 |
|
Nice strawman. | by AndyA | 2008-10-21 10:44:41 |
|
"We're not going to solve.....unless we understand | by retiqlum2 | 2008-10-21 10:47:14 |
|
I don't see that when the quote is in context | by AndyA | 2008-10-21 11:10:03 |
|
It makes a fair bit of sense. | by Peace_man | 2008-10-21 10:42:40 |
|
Your bias and lack of knowledge about the | by Classic_Jon | 2008-10-21 10:43:54 |
|
You'll have to do better than that. | by Peace_man | 2008-10-21 11:07:18 |
|
And yours did....? (n/t) | by Classic_Jon | 2008-10-21 11:08:07 |
|
Well, | by DesiredUsername | 2008-10-21 11:28:17 |
|
Why? It falls on deaf ears. (n/t) | by esbita | 2008-10-21 11:08:15 |
|
But he's being disingenuous in his discussions | by merlin | 2008-10-21 10:43:58 |
|
Except it's *not* actually payroll tax relief. | by esbita | 2008-10-21 11:48:18 |
|
Well said. A+ (n/t) | by Lab Rat | 2008-10-21 12:07:33 |
|
Hmm - that's an interesting setup. | by Peace_man | 2008-10-21 13:08:50 |
|
"Borrowing" from Social Security Fund | by DesiredUsername | 2008-10-21 13:13:43 |
|
Bonds or something | by rfrovarp | 2008-10-21 13:16:03 |
|
Dang.. I though it was some ** up thing like that | by DesiredUsername | 2008-10-21 13:18:56 |
|
*offers the vodka bottle* | by esbita | 2008-10-21 14:58:00 |
|
Republicans may be in agreement | by altordwm | 2008-10-21 13:18:43 |
|
Socialist or not may depend on who is | by Peace_man | 2008-10-21 13:22:02 |
|
About 70% were against | by DesertRat66 | 2008-10-21 13:42:42 |
|
Nah, it will happen (has been happening) | by altordwm | 2008-10-21 13:51:41 |
|
Welcome to the other side. | by Peace_man | 2008-10-21 13:59:43 |
|
Don't underestimate the power of the few | by DesertRat66 | 2008-10-21 14:18:41 |
|
Umm, I wrote my Congresscritter *against* it. | by esbita | 2008-10-21 14:56:33 |
|
Your last sentence is the crux of the problem. | by merlin | 2008-10-21 15:09:29 |
|
As DesiredUserName said: | by Peace_man | 2008-10-21 15:19:23 |
|
Technically, I asked, I didn't say. | by DesiredUsername | 2008-10-21 15:30:00 |
|
Alternatives? We already have them. | by esbita | 2008-10-21 20:16:43 |
|
Democrats for a better economy | by DesiredUsername | 2008-10-21 11:45:39 |
|
But we see this: | by rfrovarp | 2008-10-21 12:32:45 |
|
I like the opening quote. | by DesiredUsername | 2008-10-21 12:49:13 |
|
Me too. (n/t) | by rfrovarp | 2008-10-21 13:04:07 |
|
How would others respond to Letterman's question? | by kelli217 | 2008-10-21 10:39:11 |
|
Clarify, please... | by jdelphiki | 2008-10-21 10:52:57 |
|
I think kelli is referring to a Media Matters | by Lab Rat | 2008-10-21 10:58:27 |
|
Yeah, he's not been the cleanest of guys... | by jdelphiki | 2008-10-21 12:33:23 |
|
It was Letterman, and it was off the cuff. | by kelli217 | 2008-10-21 14:12:43 |
|
Breaking and Entering now = terrorism? | by DesertRat66 | 2008-10-21 11:56:38 |
|
An observation on all of this... | by AndyA | 2008-10-21 11:00:40 |
|
The hole can always be dug deeper. | by esbita | 2008-10-21 11:07:10 |
|
And what is the alternative? | by DesiredUsername | 2008-10-21 11:31:41 |
|
The alternative? Cut spending. | by esbita | 2008-10-21 11:49:25 |
|
Absolutely correct. | by DesiredUsername | 2008-10-21 11:56:25 |
|
Rather die of leukemia than prostrate cancer? (n/t) | by CynicalRyan | 2008-10-21 11:57:49 |
|
Either you make a choice or you don't. | by DesiredUsername | 2008-10-21 12:07:12 |
|
Not only "who'll drive up the debt more" | by esbita | 2008-10-21 12:13:08 |
|
But if the choice is a false dichtomy.. | by CynicalRyan | 2008-10-21 12:13:26 |
|
s/dichtomy/dichotomy/; | by CynicalRyan | 2008-10-21 12:17:50 |
|
You're right. | by DesiredUsername | 2008-10-21 12:20:41 |
|
s/prostrate/prostate/; (n/t) | by CynicalRyan | 2008-10-21 12:13:47 |
|
Yeah but... | by rfrovarp | 2008-10-21 11:11:44 |
|
I predict: | by Miss L. Anyus | 2008-10-21 11:26:10 |
|
There's an old saying | by DesertRat66 | 2008-10-21 11:24:23 |
|
Out of the darkness, a voice said | by DesiredUsername | 2008-10-21 11:34:11 |
|
Our current.... | by jdelphiki | 2008-10-21 12:30:28 |
|
But doesn't that also mean that the | by Peace_man | 2008-10-21 13:19:44 |
|
Not always... | by jdelphiki | 2008-10-21 17:20:04 |