| How should I go about seeking someone who could |
by hadji |
2008-10-01 12:57:59 |
| build for me or lease to me an invincible robot army? Would craigslist be a good place to start, maybe? |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Depends on who you want it to be invincible by | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-01 12:58:58 |
|
I was under the impression that "invincible" was a | by hadji | 2008-10-01 13:00:50 |
|
I'm between contracts right now... (n/t) | by RetiQlum2 | 2008-10-01 13:00:10 |
|
\o/ | by hadji | 2008-10-01 13:01:28 |
|
I'm backlogged... | by DesertRat66 | 2008-10-01 13:02:07 |
|
Cheaper than dirt had 3 *pallets* of Mosins | by Classic_Jon | 2008-10-01 14:13:02 |
|
I've been saying that for months (n/t) | by DesertRat66 | 2008-10-01 14:21:59 |
|
Can it be invisible too? | by VivianC | 2008-10-01 13:02:22 |
|
Well, I'd have to give them a test run, first. | by hadji | 2008-10-01 13:04:53 |
|
Can it be inexistent too? (n/t) | by joresgump | 2008-10-01 13:18:51 |
|
I believe that having an inexistent, | by hadji | 2008-10-01 13:23:41 |
|
But...they would truly be invincible! | by firehawk | 2008-10-01 13:53:42 |
|
No, it's the empty set. :-P (n/t) | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-01 14:03:40 |
|
if "Nothing" can defeat the army, then it's not | by joresgump | 2008-10-01 14:11:47 |
|
In this context, nothing = !(something), so | by firehawk | 2008-10-01 14:14:03 |
|
don't metalanguage me, mister! | by joresgump | 2008-10-01 14:18:42 |
|
Stand perfectly still, knowing they don't exist. | by firehawk | 2008-10-01 14:20:39 |
|
Honda can build the .. uhm... "manpower" | by veran | 2008-10-01 15:28:59 |
|
The invincible part would be a bit tricky... | by kahuana | 2008-10-01 16:05:03 |
