UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

UF Philosophy Corner - Political Philosophy	by MatthewDBA	2008-10-01 07:35:25
yes and no	by cyberspooked	2008-10-01 09:17:07
Yes in the sense that smaller operations are more efficient and tie up fewer resources. No in the sense that a larger operation has more resources at their disposal (among them the ability to provide redundant systems if the smaller unit fails). The question becomes what is the task at hand? In the ideal world smaller units would be better since they would not need the resources to handle the unknown elements in an environment. Ideally you want a hybrid system with the flexibility of and responsiveness of a smaller unit with the resources of a larger one. (Think of a flock of birds.) The trick is to scale the operation accordingly based upon the goals established. Case in point it's usually best for a single family to raise a child. However the government can use it's resources to help educate, protect, and provide for the child in other ways. For example, the Amber Alert system.
[ Reply ]
I'm not primarily concerned (see Important Note)	by MatthewDBA	2008-10-01 09:21:33
actually I was talking about ability as well	by cyberspooked	2008-10-01 12:40:14
Redundancy:	by MatthewDBA	2008-10-01 12:46:13

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)