|
UF Philosophy Corner - Political Philosophy | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-01 07:35:25 |
|
I'm not sure I completely understand your thesis. | by hadji | 2008-10-01 07:49:38 |
|
Hmm, good point | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-01 08:01:27 |
|
Cool! Object-oriented hierarchies! | by jdelphiki | 2008-10-01 08:14:08 |
|
I think my point is | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-01 08:19:49 |
| Childcare boils down to family on your hierarchy. |
by hadji |
2008-10-01 08:31:09 |
But then there are child welfare services, foster care, adoption agencies.
So there's childcare at the family level and childcare at the state level. By your thesis, as stated, childcare should not exist at the state level, but in reality, I'm sure you see the purposes it serves.
So when you redefine $function as $function_at_level, then your thesis becomes pointless because you're defining functions to fit your thesis rather than composing your thesis to be a meaningful opinion. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
I'm not sure I'd agree with your example | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-01 08:35:13 |
|
Mmmmm . . . this might be splitting hairs, but | by hadji | 2008-10-01 08:49:23 |
|
I think that is splitting hairs :-) | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-01 08:53:52 |
|
The standards are set at higher levels | by voxwoman | 2008-10-01 09:18:44 |
|
Example: I was listening to some sort of | by hadji | 2008-10-01 08:59:48 |
|
In other words | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-01 09:04:29 |
|
No, no, no. You've got it all wring. | by hadji | 2008-10-01 09:18:57 |
|
All wring? | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-01 09:22:20 |
|
I figured *someone* would... | by jdelphiki | 2008-10-01 10:22:49 |
|
Isn't thread twisted anyways? ;-P | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-01 10:27:06 |
|
Now you're just stringing things out. (n/t) | by sgrunt | 2008-10-01 11:46:44 |
|
Hey! ARS miscorrected my spelling! (n/t) | by hadji | 2008-10-01 12:19:13 |
