|
UF Philosophy Corner - Political Philosophy | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-01 07:35:25 |
|
I'm not sure I completely understand your thesis. | by hadji | 2008-10-01 07:49:38 |
|
Hmm, good point | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-01 08:01:27 |
| Cool! Object-oriented hierarchies! |
by jdelphiki |
2008-10-01 08:14:08 |
;)
Actually, Hadji has a good point. There *are* a lot of things that would reduce down effectively to the lowest available level...but not all things. And some things would have to operate at different (or all) levels.
I could see, though, constructing an object-oriented kind of inheritance, where common functionality is inherited down to the lower levels, but can be customized/overridden to suit the needs of the lower levels. If I had time, I'd draw up a model representing this kind of struture. If... |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
I think my point is | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-01 08:19:49 |
|
Childcare boils down to family on your hierarchy. | by hadji | 2008-10-01 08:31:09 |
|
I'm not sure I'd agree with your example | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-01 08:35:13 |
|
Mmmmm . . . this might be splitting hairs, but | by hadji | 2008-10-01 08:49:23 |
|
I think that is splitting hairs :-) | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-01 08:53:52 |
|
The standards are set at higher levels | by voxwoman | 2008-10-01 09:18:44 |
|
Example: I was listening to some sort of | by hadji | 2008-10-01 08:59:48 |
|
In other words | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-01 09:04:29 |
|
No, no, no. You've got it all wring. | by hadji | 2008-10-01 09:18:57 |
|
All wring? | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-01 09:22:20 |
|
I figured *someone* would... | by jdelphiki | 2008-10-01 10:22:49 |
|
Isn't thread twisted anyways? ;-P | by MatthewDBA | 2008-10-01 10:27:06 |
|
Now you're just stringing things out. (n/t) | by sgrunt | 2008-10-01 11:46:44 |
|
Hey! ARS miscorrected my spelling! (n/t) | by hadji | 2008-10-01 12:19:13 |
