The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

OT: specifically a >4 GiB excel file. by raptor_872008-09-15 19:12:57
  Only 4GiB? by Intrinsic2008-09-15 19:16:42
    No, >4GiB. Significant greater-than symbol. by fudje2008-09-15 19:25:51
      Actually by default on windows each process has a by Intrinsic2008-09-15 20:41:04
        That's called "VM split" by hobbs2008-09-15 22:00:07
          There is no CONFIG_3GB. by bwkaz 2008-09-15 22:28:29
There's a CONFIG_HIGHMEM_4GB, which allows the *kernel* to see 4GB of physical addresses (without any highmem setting, the kernel can only see somewhat less than 1GB of physical RAM), but (AFAIK) does not change the user/kernel VM split. It might, but it does not have to. There's also CONFIG_HIGHMEM_64GB, which allows the kernel to see 64GB of physical RAM (assuming your motherboard manufacturer wasn't skimping on physical address lines -- many do exactly that), but again, there's no particular reason this should affect the VM split. Again, it might, but it does not have to.

Virtual address space has no bearing on the total amount of physical RAM your machine can use... if you need more VM for a process, split the single process into multiple processes. :-P

There's also "just move to 64-bit already!!", which is much easier in Linux than in Windows. As another bonus, in Linux, any still-32-bit user processes get 4GB of VM for free. And there's no pressure on the kernel that way, either, like there is if you change the kernel/user split. What a deal. ;-)
[ Reply ]
            There isn't anymore, you're right. by hobbs2008-09-15 22:37:06

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)