UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

UF Philosophy Corner - Ontology	by MatthewDBA	2008-09-15 07:31:56
Seems a language problem more than philosophy.	by tallastro	2008-09-15 10:07:28
The question, I guess,	by MatthewDBA	2008-09-15 10:10:57
I'll take your word for it and just answer the	by tallastro	2008-09-15 10:43:49
So how do you distinguish the outside	by MatthewDBA	2008-09-15 10:46:29
Is the brick even relevant?	by tallastro	2008-09-15 11:21:52
One could say that the brick isn't relevant	by MatthewDBA	2008-09-15 11:28:29
Relativism again for me then.	by tallastro	2008-09-15 12:34:23
"Inside/outside" is a fundamental distinction	by MatthewDBA	2008-09-15 12:44:48
That's one purpose.	by tallastro	2008-09-15 13:52:14
I tend to think of the skin as outside. I think I would consider most coverings as outside even if you were within the thickness of the covering. Maybe it's the barrier function of outside. Light that penetrates through some skin cells before stopping would still be outside. Exposure of normally inside parts wouldn't mean I always treat them as outside. If I can see your insides, something is horribly wrong. It may move parts outside but they wouldn't be the outside. With the brick, the thickness of the outside isn't terribly relevant for me. Parts within the manufactured surface being exposed wouldn't matter much either unless it changed the dimensions of the brick enough to be a problem while building. What is outside might be more closely tied to what is a brick. If the brick is broken enough that I can't use it, it's not a brick. There ya go, some rambling thoughts. Maybe the words you seek are hidden within.
[ Reply ]

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)