The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

UF Philosophy Corner - Ontology by MatthewDBA2008-09-15 07:31:56
  Seems a language problem more than philosophy. by tallastro2008-09-15 10:07:28
    The question, I guess, by MatthewDBA2008-09-15 10:10:57
      I'll take your word for it and just answer the by tallastro2008-09-15 10:43:49
        So how do you distinguish the outside by MatthewDBA2008-09-15 10:46:29
          Is the brick even relevant? by tallastro2008-09-15 11:21:52
            One could say that the brick isn't relevant by MatthewDBA2008-09-15 11:28:29
              Relativism again for me then. by tallastro2008-09-15 12:34:23
                "Inside/outside" is a fundamental distinction by MatthewDBA 2008-09-15 12:44:48
As far as having a "purpose", I suppose its purpose is to distinguish one physical entity from another.

Topology - well, actually the theory of metric spaces - has a very exact way to define the "outside" of something. Basically, imagine a ball surrounding any point in or on the brick. If, no matter how small the ball is, it contains both brick and non-brick components, then the point is on the "outside" of the brick.

This won't work exactly for physical objects, though; at sufficiently small distances you may not be able to tell what sort of components, if any, the imaginary ball contains. But is there something similar one can devise?

I suppose my point is that I'm sure we *do* have words to distinguish inside from outside quite exactly - I'm just trying to find them.
[ Reply ]
                  That's one purpose. by tallastro2008-09-15 13:52:14

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)