UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

UF Philosophy Corner - Ontology	by MatthewDBA	2008-09-15 07:31:56
Seems a language problem more than philosophy.	by tallastro	2008-09-15 10:07:28
The issues I see involves more the imprecision of English, or it's usage, than anything else. Yes, a brick has an inside. If split, you see the inside of the formally whole brick. If you'd like to declare these pieces as bricks themselves, you see their outsides. Usually, the youngest surface will be distinguishable. Is this brick special in some way that you cannot identify the outside?
[ Reply ]
The question, I guess,	by MatthewDBA	2008-09-15 10:10:57
I'll take your word for it and just answer the	by tallastro	2008-09-15 10:43:49
So how do you distinguish the outside	by MatthewDBA	2008-09-15 10:46:29
Is the brick even relevant?	by tallastro	2008-09-15 11:21:52
One could say that the brick isn't relevant	by MatthewDBA	2008-09-15 11:28:29
Relativism again for me then.	by tallastro	2008-09-15 12:34:23
"Inside/outside" is a fundamental distinction	by MatthewDBA	2008-09-15 12:44:48
That's one purpose.	by tallastro	2008-09-15 13:52:14

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)