|
US Political Thread (n/t) | by carthax | 2008-09-02 13:19:52 |
|
Drilling. Will it help? Opine. | by carthax | 2008-09-02 13:25:03 |
|
Short term (next 5 to 10 years) yes. | by Classic_Jon | 2008-09-02 14:03:31 |
|
They should release that land then | by subbywan | 2008-09-02 14:11:14 |
|
But it is land, and they "own it" why would they | by Classic_Jon | 2008-09-02 14:25:29 |
| Because they don't own it, only control it |
by subbywan |
2008-09-02 14:50:52 |
though, that can be largely the same thing.
Considering how long they've had it, if they haven't already mapped out what needs to go where, in order to get access to the oil, then they really ARE just collecting land with no intent to use it at all.
I don't have much issue with them getting more of what they *need* to do their work, but getting more "just because" is a waste of my tax payer money, AND of my income money, and it should be strongly discouraged.
|
|
[ Reply ] |
|
As some others have brought up, they may | by Classic_Jon | 2008-09-02 15:01:25 |
|
yes ... And instead of dealing with THAT issue | by subbywan | 2008-09-02 15:13:21 |
|
Or someone with common sense on both | by Classic_Jon | 2008-09-02 15:17:36 |
|
Yup. Common sense isn't. (n/t) | by subbywan | 2008-09-02 15:19:08 |
|
Villanizing is easy, common sense and compromise | by Classic_Jon | 2008-09-02 15:23:47 |
|
Please explain... | by VivianC | 2008-09-02 15:14:03 |
|
They're stuck in court, yes? | by subbywan | 2008-09-02 15:17:50 |
|
So blame the people being sued? | by Vivianc | 2008-09-02 17:31:17 |
|
For defending? no. For looking for new ways to | by subbywan | 2008-09-02 17:41:34 |
|
Well, as you can see from the fact we still have.. | by Vivianc | 2008-09-02 18:07:37 |
|
There's no substitute for oil in the long term. | by subbywan | 2008-09-02 18:26:56 |
|
okay a fix for that part | by robertltux | 2008-09-02 19:31:56 |
|
Why not 100%? | by subbywan | 2008-09-02 19:49:35 |
