The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

UF Philosophy Corner - Ethics by MatthewDBA 2008-08-27 07:22:49
(thought I would advertise the general topic in the subject line so people knew)

Yesterday we talked about whether fiction was a lie or not, and whether it was ethical to include elements of truth in something that otherwise purported to be true. People seemed to generally have the idea that while in some circumstances (e.g. the example I used yesterday) it could be a lie, it was probably not unethical to change some parts of a true story - *if* no one was hurt by the change. The idea seemed to be that "if it doesn't hurt anyone, it's probably not unethical."

Today's question isn't directly related, but it sort of takes off from there: Are there any situations in which lying is ethically preferable to telling the truth?

Note: it's possible to tell the truth in a very diplomatic way, or in such a way that the listener can discover and accept the truth for himself. I'm not talking about that - I'm asking whether there are any times when it's unethical to tell the truth? Or at least less ethical than to tell a lie?
[ Reply ]
  It strongly depends on one's sense of ethics. by EnzoMatrix2008-08-27 07:35:16
    I want to make sure I understand your meaning. by MatthewDBA2008-08-27 07:40:48
      that mainly has to do with short term vs. by EnzoMatrix2008-08-27 07:53:19
  Yes, when not lying will lead to something by Jeff_UK2008-08-27 07:41:52
    That's my question, though by MatthewDBA2008-08-27 07:53:31
      Gestapo: Are you hiding Jews in your house? (n/t) by Control2008-08-27 08:04:21
        Ouch.. Farfetched. but true enough. by EnzoMatrix2008-08-27 08:05:45
          Even long term, it would be right to lie by Control2008-08-27 08:08:43
          It sounds like intent plays no role. by tallastro2008-08-27 08:52:29
        Good one - I didn't think of that. by MatthewDBA2008-08-27 08:12:22
  Yes, I would think so. by tallastro2008-08-27 07:43:40
    That makes sense by MatthewDBA2008-08-27 07:52:21
      Estimate the chances of being found out. by EnzoMatrix2008-08-27 07:55:32
      This is my standard for a good life. by tallastro2008-08-27 08:21:41
        Wow. Lots of good questions. by MatthewDBA2008-08-27 08:29:15
  Yes--client confidentiality by bitflipper2008-08-27 07:48:09
    Those don't require lying, just withholding. (n/t) by tallastro2008-08-27 07:54:11
    In the case of client confidentiality, though, by MatthewDBA2008-08-27 07:56:19
      No, and even dangerous! by EnzoMatrix2008-08-27 08:04:18
        Exactly by bitflipper2008-08-27 08:13:22
    ah but there is truth (-= and the truth. )-= by joecrouse2008-08-27 09:48:40
  Ethics of working for three-letter agencies? by vetitice2008-08-27 08:04:04
    BWAHAHAHA!!!!11 *cough* by JimK2008-08-27 08:44:46
      O.o?? by bitflipper2008-08-27 08:48:51
        Operation Paperclip still hard at work ;-) (n/t) by vetitice2008-08-27 09:59:51
      I miss Malvern. Had a good time there. by vetitice2008-08-27 09:58:45
  Here's one that will make you think: by BloodyViking2008-08-27 08:10:53
    Ooh, I like it. by MatthewDBA2008-08-27 08:16:57
      That is why I specified that by BloodyViking2008-08-27 08:31:35
    But the reason why the doctor's word is effective by hej2008-08-27 16:12:07
  The only case I can think where telling a lie by SaylorA2008-08-27 08:10:57
  How about a doctor to patient? by fractaledge2008-08-27 08:24:21
    Related to the placebo effect above. (n/t) by fractaledge2008-08-27 08:26:27
  Okay, here's a follow-up question. by MatthewDBA2008-08-27 08:48:25
    Doesn't it come back to harm? by bitflipper2008-08-27 08:52:49
      In that case by MatthewDBA2008-08-27 08:56:20
        Perhaps it goes back to evaluation of harm. by fractaledge2008-08-27 09:13:27
          There is that. There is also the fact by bitflipper2008-08-27 09:20:32
        cost/benefit by tallastro2008-08-27 10:41:26
          But if people are considering deception by MatthewDBA2008-08-27 10:46:20
            Did you notice that in the vast majority by tallastro2008-08-27 11:10:22
              That's a good point by MatthewDBA2008-08-27 11:14:51
                Politics springs to mind but is that an ethical by tallastro2008-08-27 11:45:12
        Because lying has very different harm in different by hej2008-08-27 15:55:44
      For the bonus question: by MatthewDBA2008-08-27 09:47:03
        So there must be a pragmatic component by bitflipper2008-08-27 09:50:51
          I don't think that's necessarily the case by MatthewDBA2008-08-27 09:56:09
        True hedonism is self limiting. by oldphart2008-08-27 09:56:54
          That's why I specified by MatthewDBA2008-08-27 09:59:42
    Because it can be important in a different context by oldphart2008-08-27 09:47:32
  Of course it can be unethical to tell the truth. by oldphart2008-08-27 09:41:24
    "Consequences are always by MatthewDBA2008-08-27 09:43:45
  of course. by joecrouse2008-08-27 09:45:23
    sometimes people are better off not knowing. (n/t) by joecrouse2008-08-27 09:45:42
      But how can you decide for someone else by MatthewDBA2008-08-27 09:49:25
        more like taking you personaly by joecrouse2008-08-27 09:54:49
          sometimes you got to lie to protect by joecrouse2008-08-27 09:55:33
            Depends how important by MatthewDBA2008-08-27 09:58:43
          I'd rather you told my wife by MatthewDBA2008-08-27 09:58:04
            Dude do you really want to be laughed at by joecrouse2008-08-27 10:01:55
              Would I care? by MatthewDBA2008-08-27 10:09:17
  Yes, sometimes it is more ethical to lie. by adiplomat2008-08-27 10:36:47
    I was thinking a very similar example. by tallastro2008-08-27 12:48:32

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)