|
Nearly 125 years late, wireless recharging arrives | by subbywan | 2008-08-22 08:58:19 |
|
Wireless recharging is easy. | by AndyA | 2008-08-22 09:14:33 |
|
75%-90% isn't a bad start. (n/t) | by subbywan | 2008-08-22 09:17:44 |
| At three feet. |
by bwkaz |
2008-08-22 09:35:23 |
Doubling the distance divides the efficiency by 4 (inverse square law, see my other post). The efficiency will not be 75% at all distances, only at three feet. Any higher distance will get a worse efficiency, simply because the electric fields drop off in intensity as you move away from their source, and can therefore transmit less power.
Unless, as I put at the end of the other post, I'm missing something. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Directional "antenna" maybe | by Menetlaus | 2008-08-22 09:46:59 |
|
Just be careful where you put Mister Peep's cage! | by kahuana | 2008-08-22 09:49:21 |
|
It'll still be inverse square. | by bwkaz | 2008-08-22 09:51:53 |
|
How's that? | by Menetlaus | 2008-08-22 11:54:12 |
|
It's not inverse-square, or plain inverse. | by bwkaz | 2008-08-22 12:23:56 |
|
It is inverse square if you are far enough away | by hej | 2008-08-22 14:25:31 |
|
Shouldn't the near version be a line, rather than | by bwkaz | 2008-08-22 15:43:50 |
|
The near version I talked about is even closer. | by hej | 2008-08-22 16:37:28 |
|
Ah, I get it. Thanks! (n/t) | by bwkaz | 2008-08-22 16:56:12 |
|
Lasers | by weedwacker01 | 2008-08-22 20:48:04 |
|
Doesn't work. | by hej | 2008-08-24 11:27:17 |
|
I think you are missing something. | by AndyA | 2008-08-22 10:33:58 |
|
... Dang, yeah, you're right. | by bwkaz | 2008-08-22 12:19:21 |
|
On the other hand: | by bwkaz | 2008-08-22 12:22:42 |
|
If you lower the frequency then | by AndyA | 2008-08-22 13:22:54 |
|
Hmm; that could be the intent. | by bwkaz | 2008-08-22 13:26:47 |
|
But it could also "universalize" recharging. | by merlin | 2008-08-22 13:31:11 |
|
Could... but won't | by Menetlaus | 2008-08-22 13:45:38 |
|
but less cables = good. | by AndyA | 2008-08-22 13:59:43 |
|
Maybe the average consumer. | by bwkaz | 2008-08-22 14:20:44 |