|
UF Philosophy Corner | by MatthewDBA | 2008-08-22 08:01:34 |
|
Yes. | by bitflipper | 2008-08-22 08:07:39 |
| Would you say |
by MatthewDBA |
2008-08-22 08:33:13 |
| that my interaction with the painting has also changed - because of the change in me? If so, where does the beauty of the painting lie - in me (so that I would have the same reaction regardless of my interaction with the painting - different lighting, company, etc.), or in my interaction with the painting? |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Actually, your interaction with the painting... | by bitflipper | 2008-08-22 08:54:55 |
|
Which depends on | by MatthewDBA | 2008-08-22 08:59:57 |
|
"Equivalent?" Unlikely. But certainly correlative. | by bitflipper | 2008-08-22 09:14:52 |
|
Exactly | by MatthewDBA | 2008-08-22 09:20:25 |
|
How certain do I need to be? | by bitflipper | 2008-08-22 09:34:25 |
|
I think it is | by MatthewDBA | 2008-08-22 09:39:59 |
|
What do you mean by "really similar"? | by bitflipper | 2008-08-22 10:06:51 |
|
I'm asking whether | by MatthewDBA | 2008-08-22 10:17:31 |
|
The idea of taking a few measurements and then | by tallastro | 2008-08-22 10:34:10 |
|
Agreed; I was thinking | by MatthewDBA | 2008-08-22 10:48:50 |
|
Perhaps they are | by bitflipper | 2008-08-22 11:11:36 |
|
You could find a change in my body, probably | by MatthewDBA | 2008-08-22 11:45:25 |
|
Of *course* it does | by bitflipper | 2008-08-22 12:21:47 |
|
I don't know where you'd find me | by MatthewDBA | 2008-08-22 12:27:17 |
|
We begin to touch on theological differences, here | by bitflipper | 2008-08-22 12:39:27 |
|
That's an interesting idea | by MatthewDBA | 2008-08-22 12:43:43 |
|
I just realized | by MatthewDBA | 2008-08-22 13:03:49 |
|
See? | by bitflipper | 2008-08-22 13:18:38 |
|
<Deleted> | <Deleted> | 2008-08-22 15:26:25 |
|
Moderated: Double Post (n/t) | by Nea | 2008-08-22 15:26:37 |
|
woops. s/world or perceptions/world of perceptions (n/t) | by bitflipper | 2008-08-22 13:19:27 |
|
Exactly. :grin: | by bitflipper | 2008-08-22 13:05:06 |
|
Now that's *really* interesting | by MatthewDBA | 2008-08-22 13:12:50 |
|
Anybody have something resembling empirical | by tallastro | 2008-08-22 13:10:51 |
|
Not definitive, no. | by MatthewDBA | 2008-08-22 13:13:17 |
|
Empirically speaking, I'm not aware of any | by bitflipper | 2008-08-22 13:37:13 |
|
:grin: You *know* what correlation means in the... | by bitflipper | 2008-08-22 10:56:06 |
|
The problem I have with that is | by MatthewDBA | 2008-08-22 11:00:35 |
|
So, your claim is that I *can't* take measurements | by bitflipper | 2008-08-22 11:15:35 |
|
My claim is | by MatthewDBA | 2008-08-22 11:44:07 |
|
Which is different from my claim. | by tallastro | 2008-08-22 11:58:23 |
|
Perhaps that's the next question then | by MatthewDBA | 2008-08-22 12:05:18 |
|
Taken in order | by bitflipper | 2008-08-22 12:18:14 |
|
I'm not certain why that last supposition | by MatthewDBA | 2008-08-22 12:19:13 |
|
Setting aside for the moment... | by bitflipper | 2008-08-22 12:04:26 |
|
I am claiming | by MatthewDBA | 2008-08-22 12:08:11 |
|
It must be measureable, or it is not measureable. | by bitflipper | 2008-08-22 12:29:25 |
|
That's what I initially thought you meant | by MatthewDBA | 2008-08-22 12:36:35 |
|
Every cause is, itself, an effect, with its own | by bitflipper | 2008-08-22 12:54:48 |
|
I think where I disagree | by MatthewDBA | 2008-08-22 13:00:10 |
|
Could very well be | by bitflipper | 2008-08-22 13:56:52 |
|
I'm not quite sure of that | by MatthewDBA | 2008-08-22 14:08:41 |
