|
Overreact much? | by PeKaJe | 2008-07-10 12:30:52 |
|
It's not just a cracker. | by Peace_man | 2008-07-10 12:54:02 |
|
My response would be the same | by PeKaJe | 2008-07-10 13:27:47 |
|
What do you suppose the reaction would | by toysbfun | 2008-07-10 13:32:14 |
|
I think the issue is... | by imperito | 2008-07-10 13:37:08 |
|
Inanimate things vs. people | by PeKaJe | 2008-07-10 13:42:14 |
|
Depends on the person. | by esbita | 2008-07-10 13:44:37 |
|
Who's predjudices? | by confused.brit | 2008-07-10 13:46:41 |
|
The original poster. | by esbita | 2008-07-10 13:51:30 |
|
Yes, the guy was disrespectful. That is clear and | by confused.brit | 2008-07-10 13:56:04 |
|
should and would are different things. | by subbywan | 2008-07-10 14:01:42 |
|
I was trying to call esbita on her logic | by confused.brit | 2008-07-10 14:14:37 |
|
How is her logic wrong? | by subbywan | 2008-07-10 14:26:27 |
|
"Had she not been wearing a short skirt, | by Phoon | 2008-07-10 14:28:11 |
|
Different issue altogether. (n/t) | by subbywan | 2008-07-10 14:39:19 |
|
It has similar overtones. | by confused.brit | 2008-07-10 14:42:06 |
|
No. There's nothing "minor" about it. | by subbywan | 2008-07-10 14:43:54 |
|
Forget the Rape. I took rape out of the equation. | by confused.brit | 2008-07-10 14:47:03 |
|
That's just it. It wasn't a minor misjudgment. | by subbywan | 2008-07-10 14:48:04 |
|
It was minor. He didnt think it would offend any1. | by confused.brit | 2008-07-10 14:50:23 |
| He was wrong. |
by subbywan |
2008-07-10 14:52:31 |
You can't say it's against the tenants of the very faith they were defending, because the Christian faith is so vastly varied that you would need to get THEIR idea of what the tenants mean to them.
Anything else is just OUR idea of what the tenants are.
|
|
[ Reply ] |
|
I don't care if the guy buggered the pastor's | by Phoon | 2008-07-10 14:55:46 |
|
From your point of view, yes. | by subbywan | 2008-07-10 14:57:09 |
|
Once upon a time, there were 19 men who thought | by Phoon | 2008-07-10 15:00:09 |
|
yes, and? | by subbywan | 2008-07-10 15:01:42 |
|
You've said enough. | by Phoon | 2008-07-10 15:02:18 |
|
Why, thank you :) (n/t) | by subbywan | 2008-07-10 15:04:05 |
|
And yet, many people in and out of that faith | by confused.brit | 2008-07-10 15:04:08 |
|
Never said you shouldn't condemn it | by subbywan | 2008-07-10 15:06:52 |
|
The problem is they probably didnt. | by confused.brit | 2008-07-10 15:10:49 |
|
Us condemning here is irrelevant. | by subbywan | 2008-07-10 15:18:40 |
|
The problem is, that is an overreaction so out of | by confused.brit | 2008-07-10 15:24:34 |
|
There's *always* understanding it. | by subbywan | 2008-07-10 15:27:03 |
|
Ok, then in that case I understand. | by confused.brit | 2008-07-10 15:38:21 |
|
That is certainly one possibility (n/t) | by subbywan | 2008-07-10 15:53:17 |
