The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
Overreact much? by PeKaJe2008-07-10 12:30:52
  It's not just a cracker. by Peace_man2008-07-10 12:54:02
    My response would be the same by PeKaJe2008-07-10 13:27:47
      What do you suppose the reaction would by toysbfun2008-07-10 13:32:14
        I think the issue is... by imperito2008-07-10 13:37:08
          Inanimate things vs. people by PeKaJe2008-07-10 13:42:14
            Depends on the person. by esbita2008-07-10 13:44:37
              Who's predjudices? by confused.brit2008-07-10 13:46:41
                The original poster. by esbita2008-07-10 13:51:30
                  Yes, the guy was disrespectful. That is clear and by confused.brit 2008-07-10 13:56:04
doesnt need saying.

But come one now, you are not telling me a muslim should threaten to... i dont know, scalp you, for having your head uncovered in a mosque.

Its exactly the same argument you appear to be using here.
[ Reply ]
                    should and would are different things. by subbywan2008-07-10 14:01:42
                      I was trying to call esbita on her logic by confused.brit2008-07-10 14:14:37
                        How is her logic wrong? by subbywan2008-07-10 14:26:27
                          "Had she not been wearing a short skirt, by Phoon2008-07-10 14:28:11
                            Different issue altogether. (n/t) by subbywan2008-07-10 14:39:19
                              Different issue. Same logic. (n/t) by Phoon2008-07-10 14:41:12
                                To a degree. (n/t) by subbywan2008-07-10 14:42:13
                                Yes, to the degree of "completely". (n/t) by Phoon2008-07-10 14:43:11
                                If you say so. (n/t) by subbywan2008-07-10 14:44:17
                              It has similar overtones. by confused.brit2008-07-10 14:42:06
                                No. There's nothing "minor" about it. by subbywan2008-07-10 14:43:54
                                Erm. by Phoon2008-07-10 14:45:08
                                Yes, but that wasn't what we were talking about by subbywan2008-07-10 14:47:10
                                Forget the Rape. I took rape out of the equation. by confused.brit2008-07-10 14:47:03
                                That's just it. It wasn't a minor misjudgment. by subbywan2008-07-10 14:48:04
                                So taking a Jeez-It is worthy of death, by Phoon2008-07-10 14:49:20
                                *WOOOSH* (n/t) by subbywan2008-07-10 14:50:36
                                So the point traveled close enough to your head by Phoon2008-07-10 14:51:41
                                Your point, no. by subbywan2008-07-10 14:54:29
                                It was minor. He didnt think it would offend any1. by confused.brit2008-07-10 14:50:23
                                He was wrong. by subbywan2008-07-10 14:52:31
                                I don't care if the guy buggered the pastor's by Phoon2008-07-10 14:55:46
                                From your point of view, yes. by subbywan2008-07-10 14:57:09
                                Once upon a time, there were 19 men who thought by Phoon2008-07-10 15:00:09
                                yes, and? by subbywan2008-07-10 15:01:42
                                You've said enough. by Phoon2008-07-10 15:02:18
                                Why, thank you :) (n/t) by subbywan2008-07-10 15:04:05
                                And yet, many people in and out of that faith by confused.brit2008-07-10 15:04:08
                                Never said you shouldn't condemn it by subbywan2008-07-10 15:06:52
                                The problem is they probably didnt. by confused.brit2008-07-10 15:10:49
                                Us condemning here is irrelevant. by subbywan2008-07-10 15:18:40
                                The problem is, that is an overreaction so out of by confused.brit2008-07-10 15:24:34
                                There's *always* understanding it. by subbywan2008-07-10 15:27:03
                                Ok, then in that case I understand. by confused.brit2008-07-10 15:38:21
                                That is certainly one possibility (n/t) by subbywan2008-07-10 15:53:17
                          Yes. But does that make the SCOPE of the negative by confused.brit2008-07-10 14:36:57
                            Perhaps. Perhaps not. by subbywan2008-07-10 14:41:03
                              No, its an overeaction from ANY point of view. by confused.brit2008-07-10 14:44:56
                                Reading the bible is an exercise in futility by subbywan2008-07-10 14:49:58
                                And that is why I am no longer catholic. (n/t) by confused.brit2008-07-10 14:51:26
                                And it's why I'm charting my own path too. (n/t) by subbywan2008-07-10 14:55:02
                                Then why believe any of it? (n/t) by Phoon2008-07-10 14:53:54
                                Because some parts work, even if others don't (n/t) by subbywan2008-07-10 14:55:29
                                You mean the parts that have been around since by Phoon2008-07-10 14:56:38
                                ssshhhhh. You need to be quiet now by subbywan2008-07-10 14:57:59
                      But do you consider that OK for western society? ( (n/t) by PeKaJe2008-07-10 14:16:47
                        If everyone agrees to the rules, yes. (n/t) by subbywan2008-07-10 14:19:06
                          No offense ... by PeKaJe2008-07-10 14:33:53
                            Why? by subbywan2008-07-10 14:38:00
                              It's in the implication ... by PeKaJe2008-07-10 14:43:18
                                Hell yes I'd like to live like that! by subbywan2008-07-10 14:45:57
                                So if I don't agree to a rule, I'm not responsible by Phoon2008-07-10 14:47:47
                                No. It means you leave the community (n/t) by subbywan2008-07-10 14:56:41
                                So, the only people that can be in any community by Phoon2008-07-10 14:58:39
                                If that makes you happy, the answer is yes (n/t) by subbywan2008-07-10 14:59:26
                                It doesn't make me happy. It follows from your by Phoon2008-07-10 15:01:43
                                swing-anna-miss. by subbywan2008-07-10 15:02:36
                                How is it wrong? by Phoon2008-07-10 15:03:59
                                I don't. and it didn't. by subbywan2008-07-10 15:09:56
                            Seconded. by confused.brit2008-07-10 14:38:39

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)