The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
Overreact much? by PeKaJe2008-07-10 12:30:52
  It's not just a cracker. by Peace_man 2008-07-10 12:54:02
Look at it another way. Would you be upset if someone wiped their feet on a piece of cloth? After all, it's just a piece of cloth, right?

How about if it were the flag of your country? Still the same?
[ Reply ]
    My response would be the same by PeKaJe2008-07-10 13:27:47
      In the Catholic view by MatthewDBA2008-07-10 13:31:42
        Religious laws != laws by PeKaJe2008-07-10 13:40:21
          I didn't have any intention of implying by MatthewDBA2008-07-10 13:42:11
            And in this case ... by PeKaJe2008-07-10 13:45:55
              *orders a shrimp cocktail* (n/t) by Phoon2008-07-10 13:46:25
                *gives extra horseradish* (n/t) by MatthewDBA2008-07-10 13:58:34
              Being tremendously offended? Justified. by MatthewDBA2008-07-10 13:49:18
                And maybe this is where the real story lies. by Peace_man2008-07-10 13:58:39
                  I have to question if you read the linked articles by PeKaJe2008-07-10 14:09:03
                    I don't think that was in the article I read. by Peace_man2008-07-10 14:42:55
      What do you suppose the reaction would by toysbfun2008-07-10 13:32:14
        I think the issue is... by imperito2008-07-10 13:37:08
          Inanimate things vs. people by PeKaJe2008-07-10 13:42:14
            People, certainly, in general by MatthewDBA2008-07-10 13:43:46
              That's pretty arbitrary by PeKaJe2008-07-10 13:48:55
                Depends on what you want to do by MatthewDBA2008-07-10 13:51:41
                  Hmm ... by PeKaJe2008-07-10 14:11:55
                Doesn't matter. it matters to them. by subbywan2008-07-10 13:51:56
            Depends on the person. by esbita2008-07-10 13:44:37
              *passes esbita some camomile tea* by MatthewDBA2008-07-10 13:46:09
                I THOUGHT THAT WAS A KIND OF SOAP? by vetitice2008-07-10 13:49:39
                  Are you implying something of me? by esbita2008-07-10 13:54:26
                    Soul Music by vetitice2008-07-10 13:55:24
                    It seems you come, troll and leave a lot esbita. (n/t) by confused.brit2008-07-10 14:01:22
                      Not a lot by MatthewDBA2008-07-10 14:04:09
              Who's predjudices? by confused.brit2008-07-10 13:46:41
                The original poster. by esbita2008-07-10 13:51:30
                  Yes, the guy was disrespectful. That is clear and by confused.brit2008-07-10 13:56:04
                    should and would are different things. by subbywan2008-07-10 14:01:42
                      I was trying to call esbita on her logic by confused.brit2008-07-10 14:14:37
                        How is her logic wrong? by subbywan2008-07-10 14:26:27
                          "Had she not been wearing a short skirt, by Phoon2008-07-10 14:28:11
                            Different issue altogether. (n/t) by subbywan2008-07-10 14:39:19
                              Different issue. Same logic. (n/t) by Phoon2008-07-10 14:41:12
                                To a degree. (n/t) by subbywan2008-07-10 14:42:13
                                Yes, to the degree of "completely". (n/t) by Phoon2008-07-10 14:43:11
                                If you say so. (n/t) by subbywan2008-07-10 14:44:17
                              It has similar overtones. by confused.brit2008-07-10 14:42:06
                                No. There's nothing "minor" about it. by subbywan2008-07-10 14:43:54
                                Erm. by Phoon2008-07-10 14:45:08
                                Yes, but that wasn't what we were talking about by subbywan2008-07-10 14:47:10
                                Forget the Rape. I took rape out of the equation. by confused.brit2008-07-10 14:47:03
                                That's just it. It wasn't a minor misjudgment. by subbywan2008-07-10 14:48:04
                                So taking a Jeez-It is worthy of death, by Phoon2008-07-10 14:49:20
                                *WOOOSH* (n/t) by subbywan2008-07-10 14:50:36
                                So the point traveled close enough to your head by Phoon2008-07-10 14:51:41
                                Your point, no. by subbywan2008-07-10 14:54:29
                                It was minor. He didnt think it would offend any1. by confused.brit2008-07-10 14:50:23
                                He was wrong. by subbywan2008-07-10 14:52:31
                                I don't care if the guy buggered the pastor's by Phoon2008-07-10 14:55:46
                                From your point of view, yes. by subbywan2008-07-10 14:57:09
                                Once upon a time, there were 19 men who thought by Phoon2008-07-10 15:00:09
                                yes, and? by subbywan2008-07-10 15:01:42
                                You've said enough. by Phoon2008-07-10 15:02:18
                                Why, thank you :) (n/t) by subbywan2008-07-10 15:04:05
                                And yet, many people in and out of that faith by confused.brit2008-07-10 15:04:08
                                Never said you shouldn't condemn it by subbywan2008-07-10 15:06:52
                                The problem is they probably didnt. by confused.brit2008-07-10 15:10:49
                                Us condemning here is irrelevant. by subbywan2008-07-10 15:18:40
                                The problem is, that is an overreaction so out of by confused.brit2008-07-10 15:24:34
                                There's *always* understanding it. by subbywan2008-07-10 15:27:03
                                Ok, then in that case I understand. by confused.brit2008-07-10 15:38:21
                                That is certainly one possibility (n/t) by subbywan2008-07-10 15:53:17
                          Yes. But does that make the SCOPE of the negative by confused.brit2008-07-10 14:36:57
                            Perhaps. Perhaps not. by subbywan2008-07-10 14:41:03
                              No, its an overeaction from ANY point of view. by confused.brit2008-07-10 14:44:56
                                Reading the bible is an exercise in futility by subbywan2008-07-10 14:49:58
                                And that is why I am no longer catholic. (n/t) by confused.brit2008-07-10 14:51:26
                                And it's why I'm charting my own path too. (n/t) by subbywan2008-07-10 14:55:02
                                Then why believe any of it? (n/t) by Phoon2008-07-10 14:53:54
                                Because some parts work, even if others don't (n/t) by subbywan2008-07-10 14:55:29
                                You mean the parts that have been around since by Phoon2008-07-10 14:56:38
                                ssshhhhh. You need to be quiet now by subbywan2008-07-10 14:57:59
                      But do you consider that OK for western society? ( (n/t) by PeKaJe2008-07-10 14:16:47
                        If everyone agrees to the rules, yes. (n/t) by subbywan2008-07-10 14:19:06
                          No offense ... by PeKaJe2008-07-10 14:33:53
                            Why? by subbywan2008-07-10 14:38:00
                              It's in the implication ... by PeKaJe2008-07-10 14:43:18
                                Hell yes I'd like to live like that! by subbywan2008-07-10 14:45:57
                                So if I don't agree to a rule, I'm not responsible by Phoon2008-07-10 14:47:47
                                No. It means you leave the community (n/t) by subbywan2008-07-10 14:56:41
                                So, the only people that can be in any community by Phoon2008-07-10 14:58:39
                                If that makes you happy, the answer is yes (n/t) by subbywan2008-07-10 14:59:26
                                It doesn't make me happy. It follows from your by Phoon2008-07-10 15:01:43
                                swing-anna-miss. by subbywan2008-07-10 15:02:36
                                How is it wrong? by Phoon2008-07-10 15:03:59
                                I don't. and it didn't. by subbywan2008-07-10 15:09:56
                            Seconded. by confused.brit2008-07-10 14:38:39
                  I think you may misunderstand my point here by PeKaJe2008-07-10 14:03:03
                    So would agree agree that the blogger's by merlin2008-07-10 14:15:02
                      It's exactly the same thing that was done by Phoon2008-07-10 14:16:34
                        You see, here's the thing. by Phoon2008-07-10 14:19:58
                          Sometimes, nobody reacts well. by Peace_man2008-07-10 14:37:24
                            By any sane standards, it shouldn't be rude. by Phoon2008-07-10 14:40:54
                              Whoever said that religions followed by Peace_man2008-07-10 14:47:34
                                I'll tolerate you swinging your arms, by Phoon2008-07-10 14:50:22
                                I don't see how that applies to this case. by Peace_man2008-07-10 15:08:21
        Pretty tame. by lheggland2008-07-10 14:27:59
    I'm not going to take the time to read through by AprylMae2008-07-10 21:03:04
      Second linked article by PeKaJe2008-07-10 22:36:26

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)